Roach ID, it's huge!

Moose9

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
151
Can someone please ID the roach in the photo below? I found 2 of them in my B. dubia collection. I know there not adult male dubia. They are a good 3". They just winged out in the last week. I know this cause there were 2 very large, extra wide nymphs that looked odd. Thanks in advance, Greg.

 

Matt K

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
941
Blaberus fusca or a fusca hybrid.

Definately not Blaberus craniifer, as B. craniifer are black. Though it is a common mistake in parts of Europe to call them craniifer.

This is what Blaberus craniifer looks like:

 

Matt K

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
941
Here are some photos to help discern a few common species other than B. fusca:

 

Moose9

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
151
Thanks for the quick ID. I separated them from my B. dubia, put them in there own container. They appear to be a male and female. Will see what happens. Should have a small colony in about a year.
 

calum

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
1,778
ah, ok then. I don't really use colour when ID'ing soemthing as it seems to differ alot depending on where the speciemen is collected or such. (well, this is the case in scorpions at least)
 

joshuai

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Oct 10, 2008
Messages
820
ah, ok then. I don't really use colour when ID'ing soemthing as it seems to differ alot depending on where the speciemen is collected or such. (well, this is the case in scorpions at least)
Not with B cranniffer the tru ones always have black wings i have a colony my self.
 

Matt K

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
941
Calum does make a good point though. I have certainly seen with scorpions how individuals of the same species can have dramatically different coloration. This seems true with some centipedes as well.
 

pinkfoot

Arachnolord
Old Timer
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
612
Thanks for the quick ID. I separated them from my B. dubia, put them in there own container. They appear to be a male and female. Will see what happens. Should have a small colony in about a year.
Moose, if they both have those wings you have a gay couple...;) only way they'll start a colony is to adopt.
 

hasani1408

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
172
looks like Blaberus giganteus to me. I will double check the pics when I get to work. but I'm %95 sure.
 

RoachGirlRen

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
994
Moose, if they both have those wings you have a gay couple...;) only way they'll start a colony is to adopt.
Nope; the presence or absence of wings are not a reliable way to sex all (or even most) roach species. Blaberus giganteus, Blaberus fusca, and many other related species display wings in both sexes. The best way to sex most common roach species at any life stage is ventrally via the last body segment.

Anyways, my money is on B. giganteus or B. fusca.
 

Matt K

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
941
Considering the size of the roach in comparison to the bottom of the cup its in and the fingers holding the cup in the background I think its too small for B.giganteus, so B.fusca is my vote. Additionally the wing/abdomen proportions and the pronotum spot give the same impression to me compared to my colonies of either one....
 

Elytra and Antenna

Arachnoking
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Messages
2,553
Might be a slightly beat up discoidalis male. I'm 99% sure it's not B. giganteus. Did you ask the guy you got the dubia from?
 

Arachnobored

Arachnopeon
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
28
Nope; the presence or absence of wings are not a reliable way to sex all (or even most) roach species. Blaberus giganteus, Blaberus fusca, and many other related species display wings in both sexes. The best way to sex most common roach species at any life stage is ventrally via the last body segment.

Anyways, my money is on B. giganteus or B. fusca.
Actually, in adult B. fusca it is 100% reliable. The adult females are not even remotely similar. :cool:



Credit to James @ blaberus.com
 
Last edited:

billopelma

Arachnolord
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
604
Actually, in adult B. fusca it is 100% reliable. The adult females are not even remotely similar.
As far as I know, in all Blaberus sp. the males and females have full wings and are similar dorsally. That picture of the fusca is of an adult and two nymphs. You may be thinking of Blaptica dubia, where there is obvious dimorphism...


Bill
 

xhexdx

ArachnoGod
Old Timer
Joined
Jul 20, 2007
Messages
5,351
As far as I know, in all Blaberus sp. the males and females have full wings and are similar dorsally. That picture of the fusca is of an adult and two nymphs. You may be thinking of Blaptica dubia, where there is obvious dimorphism...


Bill

I'm pretty sure this is correct. I'll go check my colony later.
 

Matt K

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Mar 27, 2007
Messages
941
ALL species of Blaberus, even B. fusca, have full wings for males AND females and are very similar in overall appearance. There are no exceptions to this. They are not like Blaptica dubia where females have vestigial wings and males have full wings.

This is a fact.
 

Moose9

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 28, 2009
Messages
151
I measured the one in the cup and it is 2¾". The one in the cup has a thinner body structure than the other. I will get a photo of there undersides to show the last abdominal segment so we can try to determin there sex. If I looked at the last abdominal segments correctly, than they should be m/f.
 

pinkfoot

Arachnolord
Old Timer
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
612
My bad.

I started this confusion with my little joke - apologies! :8o
 
Top