i have a blue lobster and i had it for 5 years and it just molted 2 weeks ago (first time in 8 months). and i had one that was pregnet for 4-5 months, so they live for a long time aswell.Brian S said:If I was betting, it would be on an arachnid of some kind,however I don't have a clue how long a lobster or some other crustaceans live. :?
Yeah, but how would you keep track of that? I mean, if you have one amoeba and it splits, then you wouldn't know which one is the "original" amoeba. So it's like, you'd then have two amoebas whose age you'd have to keep track of. Then they'd both split, and you wouldn't know which of the 4 amoebas to call the original amoeba. So then you'd have 4 amoebas whose age you have to keep track of. Then you'd eventually have a huge colony of amoebas (I don't know if "colony" is the right word, though). And some of them would always be dying off. But how do you tell which ones are dying off? Does it even matter? If you have an ongoing colony of amoebas, does that mean that the original amoeba has become immortal? Or does the simple act of splitting mean that the parent has died during the creation of its offspring? Like, if one amoeba turns into two amoebas, and you can't tell which amoeba to classify as the original amoeba, wouldn't it be more convenient to think of the original amoeba as having ceased to exist? And if they're BOTH the original amoeba, then doesn't that, by extension, imply that amoebas are immortal?MantidAssassins said:amoebas reproduce through splitting and supposedly don't actually age which means some may be millions of years old.
I would argue the second option, just because it's more interesting to think aboutwhoami? said:Like, if one amoeba turns into two amoebas, and you can't tell which amoeba to classify as the original amoeba, wouldn't it be more convenient to think of the original amoeba as having ceased to exist? And if they're BOTH the original amoeba, then doesn't that, by extension, imply that amoebas are immortal?