intergenerational inbreeding in roaches

musihuto

Arachnodemon
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
666
so my question is twofold:
i) are the negative effects of intergenerational inbreeding in roaches really that serious?
ii) if the effects of intergenerational inbreeding in roaches really were that serious, then wouldn't they have evolved some behavioural adaptation to avoid it?

thanks! :D
- munis

P.S. if anyone has any papers on the subject, or knows where they might be found, that would be awesome.
 

Crotalus

Arachnoking
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 14, 2002
Messages
2,433
I had a colony of false death head going for 7+ years and never had problems. Nothing I could notice anyway.
 

recluse

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
307
I have had an N. cinerea colony going for over four years and so far have not noticed any changes, just my observations.
 

musihuto

Arachnodemon
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 21, 2006
Messages
666
awesome.
would you guys happen to have an estimate on the number of adults in your colonies?

thanks! :D
- munis
 

recluse

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
307
I have several thousand right now, I use N. cinerea exclusively for feeding, I have way to many to feed off.
 

Crotalus

Arachnoking
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 14, 2002
Messages
2,433
awesome.
would you guys happen to have an estimate on the number of adults in your colonies?

thanks! :D
- munis
Hundreds. But I was down to only a few adults once but managed to save them and soon the colony was back in numbers.
 

Aquanut

Arachnosquire
Old Timer
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
127
I have a Discoid colony thats almost 4 years old. It started from 12 nymphs to adults, and is at least 2000 now. No problems that I've seen.
 

the_frog_kid

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
159
there are negative effects but they are so small you wont notice unless you are studing them like i do
my friend had a strain of giganteus that was "white winged" had no dark pigment on the wings
not a-melanistic not lucistic not albino
if you have very limited genetics roaches will "stunt" meening they get smaller
some of mine did that befor
thats why im pround to have very geed genetics
i have dubia from a certen californian supplier they are less than a inch long
but my german dubia are over 2 inches
very weired
i guess the cali supplier started with a very limited amount




thanx froggy
 

the_frog_kid

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
159
no but i saw them first hand
i will ask if he has any and tell him to post them here
i am working on identifing a eublaberus sp.
they were sold to me as distanti but they are massive and have black legs insted of orange




thanx froggy
 

xelda

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Jul 22, 2004
Messages
372
I think the size difference is based more on husbandry. If you don't maintain healthy, well-hydrated colonies, the roaches will be much smaller. So when you get new stock from a different source, of course they're going to look huge in comparison--they're coming from someone who takes care of his or her roaches differently. I bet after you keep the new stock for awhile under the same care, they'll end up looking small too.

Now here's something else to think about. If having a limited gene pool poses such a problem, how do you explain the success of parthenogenetic insects? Or of social insects that don't mate outside of the colony?
 

Bayushi

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
1,236
you have to keep in mind that even in the wild, roaches live in such close proximity that there has to be inbreeding going on. it's been happening since man started walking upright and yet roaches are still around and will still be around long after man has died off. So you have to think that inbreeding does very little harm to them on the whole.
 

the_frog_kid

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
159
well some things i cant explain
the new eublaberus have been in my care for a few generations under the same husbandry as the others
im not a idiot you know
everytime i say something you guys think im a moron
im gettin sick of it
as for parthanigenic roaches that is a whole differant idea
i have no clue since no one does
its the same with ants
how does it work that males and queens come from fertilized eggs and workers come from unfertilized eggs
there still is no explanation that i know of




thanx froggy
 

Elytra and Antenna

Arachnoking
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 12, 2002
Messages
2,552
How many thousands of years have silkworm moths been in culture? Roach genes are less subject to drift than almost any other organism.
 

the_frog_kid

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
159
hmm
this is just my conclution but i also have a strain of hissers that ive had 4 years and the keep gettin bigger
about 30% bigger by now
i guess how i am culturing them
but then again silkworms in culture are completly differant that wild ones




thanx froggy
 

bugmankeith

Arachnoking
Old Timer
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
2,730
There are no wild Bombyx Mori anymore, and the domestic ones we know of no longer fly, let alone walk very much.

Cant say what would happen if someone raised them in a greenhouse for many years in safety without predators.

Would they develop wild characteristics, or not? Nobody knows as of now.

I once put silkworms on my mulberry tree knowing they wont go anywhere, they lived for about 2 weeks, through rain,wind, and drought, but the yellow jackets eventually picked them off like berries.
 

the_frog_kid

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
Feb 13, 2006
Messages
159
yes they have been cultured for so long they are a new specie
i forget what they were from
i used to know when i bred them but i have forgotten:8o

i know people who have put them on the introduced mullberry that live there
didnt work out
they are so inbred they just fall off lol

what ever i dont really care eh lol




thanx froggy
 
Top