You got any pics of them? When I googled, I only got 2 tiny ones I couldn't really see from here on the board.Looks like a H. Logipies
Here is a pics of mine also pics of my cobalt I picked up From Brian at MIARACHNIDS. http://www.arachnoboards.com/ab/showthread.php?t=146175You got any pics of them? When I googled, I only got 2 tiny ones I couldn't really see from here on the board.
I think I had got one of these and they are really aggressive...don't they ?Here she is, sold to me as a cobalt. She spent the first day at the top of her enclosure, but has now dug out one of the corners of the tank and put some web over herself.
![]()
![]()
![]()
then what is it? please have as much to back this as possible becuz i refuse to sell a mislabeled T, as our knowledge and quality assurance is primarily what seperates us from most LPS. the 3 species in the photos all look identical to each other and being that we've dealt with this species before (at the pet shop i work for) im quite confident in my identification but im not so bullheaded i wont admit i am wrong. im very curious as to know what the T is that i have as well as the two other people on this thread have so please let us know.That's not H. minax...
so are we stating that mine IS a H. minax but of a different region there for NOT a Thailand Black Earth Tiger? and if it is sp. Vietnam what would its common name be referred to as, and would one be inclined to label it Haplopelma sp. "vietnam" or would H. minax sp. "vietnam" be appropriate?It looks Haplopelma sp. "vietnam". They are commonly mistaken as minax.
BUT, if I remember correctly phormingochilus told me about a year ago, that he believes they are just a different color form of minax. I'm not sure if it's official now or not.
Edit: "Yes - I am absolutely 100% certain that what I have is the real minax. I have both exact collecting site, and have confirmed the identity with Volker von Wirth and by my own research ;-) That doesn't rule out your spider as H. minax as there are a few regional varieties which differs by subtle colour variations. The typical north thai variety (which is identical to the type species) is jet black with a dark greenish carapace and uniform black abdomen as adult (juveniles has very prominent tiger stripes) and reach about 20 cm. legspan. The cambodian variety is jetblack with faint markings on the abdomens and has black carapace, but is smaller - reaching between 16-18 cm. The vietnamese variety is dark gunship grey on legs and carapace with mottled abdominal markings on greyish/beige and orangeish spinnerets and becomes 15-16 cm. legspan. The specimen on Paiki "looks" like a young adult of the thai variety."
Edit2: As you can see, the specimen I had was "cambodian variety". Both of the others are MUCH darker than sp. "vietnam".
Because I'm not sure if sp. "vietnam" is officially considered to be a color form of minax yet, I think it's safe to use the sp name, as they are called in the hobby. It probably doesn't even have a common name, and they are complete mess anyway.so are we stating that mine IS a H. minax but of a different region there for NOT a Thailand Black Earth Tiger? and if it is sp. Vietnam what would its common name be referred to as, and would one be inclined to label it Haplopelma sp. "vietnam" or would H. minax sp. "vietnam" be appropriate?