- Joined
- Apr 8, 2009
- Messages
- 2,672
How do you know that had anything to do with this report? No where did they say what ages the "gangsta's" were.And we wonder why all of these bans are going on now..I think parent should second think the maturity level of there kids befor they let them even own something with any possible hostile behaviour.
How do you know that had anything to do with this report? No where did they say what ages the "gangsta's" were.
This was very sensationalised, it shouldn't even be news. I would rather be bitten by an 18 foot python than stabbed by anything more than a .5 inch blade. But a stabbing probably wouldn't be a media report. If the gang had stapled him with a regular office stapler it wouldn't make the news, why should a small nonvenomous snake bite make the news?
TBH
Hah, yea. I guess the gang was trying to make a name for themselves, like the "Tunnel Snakes" or "Devils Serpents". I dunno, but i would say b/c firearms are strictly controlled in England they couldn't get anything else. Or maybe they were to pansy to stab the guy so they had their "weapon" do it lol.2 puncture wounds does sound a bit questionable. Somewhere the story seems to have taken a sensationalist turn. (Or the kid was somehow lucky enough to only have 2 teeth puncture his hand while the 2nd row of teeth on the palate and the teeth along the upper jaw missed).
Now the important part......what sort of a weak gang uses snakes as a weapon. I mean violence is typically not appropriate, but what happened to the good old days when gangsters would use real weapons.....bats, chains, knives, guns, etc....snakes? Imagine how different 1992 would have been if snakes were the weapon of choice........Sublime and Ice Cube would have had very different songs.
Yep. Since when did teenagers qualify as toddlers?anyone else notice the caption?
and sense when did pythons have fangs?Yep. Since when did teenagers qualify as toddlers?
Yeah I noticed that when I opened the link just a little while ago. Were they too lazy to use another, flesh picture of the snake in question and took one from another attack instead?Yep. Since when did teenagers qualify as toddlers?
Just in case the story itself wasn't sensational enough, the editors squeezed in a photo of a baby-eating python! BAM! BAM! That just happened!Yeah I noticed that when I opened the link just a little while ago. Were they too lazy to use another, flesh picture of the snake in question and took one from another attack instead?
:wall: :?