- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 11,508
I'm not sure how I got dragged into this. The folks at the university were trying to take a critter census to determine the health of some wetland and raprarian areas. It wasn't working out too well as the results depended on the ingenuity and stealth of the groups of census takers.
I came up with a weird bright idea a professor bought and tried. They put a tape recorder and microphone in various areas. Then they edited the tape for when the frogs were the most boisterous. Then just play the tape through a graphic equalizer. The broader the spectrum of croaks, the greater the age variation and types of frogs. Areas with only limited high pitched chirps only had young frogs.
Instead of hours of wading through swamps, the graphic LED display would give you the whole census at a glance.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Stick Out Tongue :p :p"
I came up with a weird bright idea a professor bought and tried. They put a tape recorder and microphone in various areas. Then they edited the tape for when the frogs were the most boisterous. Then just play the tape through a graphic equalizer. The broader the spectrum of croaks, the greater the age variation and types of frogs. Areas with only limited high pitched chirps only had young frogs.
Instead of hours of wading through swamps, the graphic LED display would give you the whole census at a glance.