- Joined
- Aug 30, 2002
- Messages
- 1,777
Hi,
Spider sexdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
Cheers,
Steve
Spider sex
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37923/379236c732f89f395002f52aca8d1a3cac1478f8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19b8e/19b8eb1da85e8e5166cfdeb233c9e938ea09abe2" alt=""
Cheers,
Steve
Hi Sean,Sean said:Sweet, what species?
Steve Nunn said:Hi Sean,
They are currently undescribed, but not for long, Robert Raven is describing them soonThey are currently from what is known as Selenocosmia, although they are a distinctly seperate generic group from the small group of true Selenocosmia found on/around Java and Singapore (ie: S.javanensis group) in that they lack the intercheliceral pegs seen in the real group, also the spermethecal morpholgy differs significantly, although whether or not this character should be considered is perhaps in question nowadays.
However, soon they will be placed in the resurrected genus Phlogius, which were originally described by Koch in 1874 (under the name Phrictus), the type for this genus P.crassipes being found only 180kms from this species. This genus is found all through the Nth Qld coastlines, into Papua New Guinea, that's pretty much the general geographic range (with the exception of several spp. found slightly further west, S.effera, etc). Volker posted a photo of S.effera recently actually.
But, yeah, currently probably best to call these "Australian Selenocosmia", until the work is finished
Cheers,
Steve
Cpt.nemO said:Hey steve, wats up man, very nice pics !!! congrats.
cya.
Hi,skeletor said:What kind of camera were you using? Looks like you had some kind of macro attachment to get that close and retain the detail...