Ianpcfauna
Arachnopeon
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2013
- Messages
- 29
If that's the case, then no need to breed. If you're that uncertain.I'll go with Hobby form.
No need messing with any true "Nicaragua", "Honduras" bloodlines.
It's nicaraguan, no need to create more hybrids.Breeding is my choosing... I've seen plenty labeled simply B. albopilosum.
While both nicaraguan and honduran can be labeled as B. albopilosum, note that they are different localities. Not different morphs. The nicaraguan variant is still quite new to this hobby, so please don't encourage hybrids of different localities.Agreed.
A "morph" and a "variant" are the same thing. There is evidence that they are two different, but very closely related species, judging by the spermathecae of the females. They really really shouldn't be bred together.While both nicaraguan and honduran can be labeled as B. albopilosum, note that they are different localities. Not different morphs. The nicaraguan variant is still quite new to this hobby, so please don't encourage hybrids of different localities.
Agreed, absolutely.A "morph" and a "variant" are the same thing. There is evidence that they are two different, but very closely related species, judging by the spermathecae of the females. They really really shouldn't be bred together.
My issue with the terms "Nicaraguan" for the fluffy white ones and "Honduran" for the fluffy gold ones is that people can get confused that they are only restricted to these two countries. The fluffy white ones are Brachypelma albopilosum (pending a change in genus placement, but that is another discussion) and also occur in Costa Rica. The full distribution of the fluffy gold ones are not completely known, I don't think, but the label of "Honduran" means that is the country they were either collected in, exported from, or both; the two are not mutually exclusive. The label of "Nicaraguan" following the species name means the same thing. Since Costa Rica bans the commercial export of its wild life, it's plausible that the country of collection and export is Nicaragua but I always wonder if they were really collected in Costa Rica and exported from Nicaragua. Brachypelma albopilosum used to be called "Costa Rican Curly Hair" many many years ago.
Personally, I would like if the hobby would stop calling them both Brachypelma albopilosum. It should be Brachypelma albopilosum for the white ones and Brachypelma sp. "Gold Curly Hair" for the gold ones pending publication of taxonomic studies of these two species.
You remembered! I didn't know if mentioning that you were the source of the pictures was appropriate since you sent them to me in a PM. I saved them though and here they are. Your pictures are the evidence I refer to that these are different species.Agreed, absolutely.
I sent you and one other a PM years ago regarding these. Their spermatheca are completely different, which points to different species. I included pictures in that PM, but in my youthful wisdom I deleted both the conversation and pictures. If you have them, I'd be more than grateful if you were to post them again.
YES.You remembered! I didn't know if mentioning that you were the source of the pictures was appropriate since you sent them to me in a PM. I saved them though and here they are. Your pictures are the evidence I refer to that these are different species.
Brachypelma sp. "Golden Curly Hair" (Honduras)
View attachment 303038
Brachypelma albopilosum (Nicaragua)
View attachment 303039
Anything else. Brachypelma spp. readily breed amongst each other. People from the reptile hobby wanting to make "variants" but don't understand how speciation works.I suppose my question would be, what would the hobby variant have been hybridized with, "true" B. albopilosum, or something else?
I'm sure I read something along the lines that the Honduran variant should actually be called B. aurapilosum (or something like that), I can't for the life of me remember where. Hopefully the two species get sorted with the revision and we can be done with all this "hobby/true form" nonsense.It should be Brachypelma albopilosum for the white ones and Brachypelma sp. "Gold Curly Hair" for the gold ones pending publication of taxonomic studies of these two species.
Brachy species will readily breed with each other, it's generally assumed that they're all vagans hybrids though (at least over here anyway).I suppose my question would be, what would the hobby variant have been hybridized with, "true" B. albopilosum, or something else (sorry don't know much about the species, let alone the confusion? around it)?
You are probably thinking of an article published in the journal of the British Tarantula Society by Ray Gabriel and Stuart Longhorn. Or at least read something somewhere that was based on that article. They published an article about these two types of Brachypelma albopilosum in which they stated something along the lines of how the scientific name of the gold colored ones would be more accurate as Brachypelma aureopilosum. "Aureo" meaning gold while "albo" meaning white. There were no nomenclature changes in that article. It was just an overview of how there are two different "curly hair" species in the hobby, how they are different, where they come from, and so on.I'm sure I read something along the lines that the Honduran variant should actually be called B. aurapilosum (or something like that), I can't for the life of me remember where. Hopefully the two species get sorted with the revision and we can be done with all this "hobby/true form" nonsense.