B. albopilosum , Nicaragua or Honduras...

Ianpcfauna

Arachnopeon
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
29
19.jpg 19.jpg 19.jpg I picked up this female the other day. Down the road when I want to pair her up... I'd like to know exactly what I am dealing with. Nicaraguan or Honduran.
I've been told Nicaraguan.
Let me know your thoughts.
Any help... Thanks!
 

Ianpcfauna

Arachnopeon
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
29
Thank y'all for your help!

I'll go with Hobby form.
No need messing with any true "Nicaragua", "Honduras" bloodlines.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Liquifin

Laxow Legacy LLC
Arachnosupporter
Joined
May 30, 2017
Messages
2,151
While both nicaraguan and honduran can be labeled as B. albopilosum, note that they are different localities. Not different morphs. The nicaraguan variant is still quite new to this hobby, so please don't encourage hybrids of different localities.:cool:
 

AphonopelmaTX

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
1,884
While both nicaraguan and honduran can be labeled as B. albopilosum, note that they are different localities. Not different morphs. The nicaraguan variant is still quite new to this hobby, so please don't encourage hybrids of different localities.:cool:
A "morph" and a "variant" are the same thing. There is evidence that they are two different, but very closely related species, judging by the spermathecae of the females. They really really shouldn't be bred together.

My issue with the terms "Nicaraguan" for the fluffy white ones and "Honduran" for the fluffy gold ones is that people can get confused that they are only restricted to these two countries. The fluffy white ones are Brachypelma albopilosum (pending a change in genus placement, but that is another discussion) and also occur in Costa Rica. The full distribution of the fluffy gold ones are not completely known, I don't think, but the label of "Honduran" means that is the country they were either collected in, exported from, or both; the two are not mutually exclusive. The label of "Nicaraguan" following the species name means the same thing. Since Costa Rica bans the commercial export of its wild life, it's plausible that the country of collection and export is Nicaragua but I always wonder if they were really collected in Costa Rica and exported from Nicaragua. Brachypelma albopilosum used to be called "Costa Rican Curly Hair" many many years ago. ;)

Personally, I would like if the hobby would stop calling them both Brachypelma albopilosum. It should be Brachypelma albopilosum for the white ones and Brachypelma sp. "Gold Curly Hair" for the gold ones pending publication of taxonomic studies of these two species.
 

EulersK

Arachnonomicon
Staff member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
3,291
A "morph" and a "variant" are the same thing. There is evidence that they are two different, but very closely related species, judging by the spermathecae of the females. They really really shouldn't be bred together.

My issue with the terms "Nicaraguan" for the fluffy white ones and "Honduran" for the fluffy gold ones is that people can get confused that they are only restricted to these two countries. The fluffy white ones are Brachypelma albopilosum (pending a change in genus placement, but that is another discussion) and also occur in Costa Rica. The full distribution of the fluffy gold ones are not completely known, I don't think, but the label of "Honduran" means that is the country they were either collected in, exported from, or both; the two are not mutually exclusive. The label of "Nicaraguan" following the species name means the same thing. Since Costa Rica bans the commercial export of its wild life, it's plausible that the country of collection and export is Nicaragua but I always wonder if they were really collected in Costa Rica and exported from Nicaragua. Brachypelma albopilosum used to be called "Costa Rican Curly Hair" many many years ago. ;)

Personally, I would like if the hobby would stop calling them both Brachypelma albopilosum. It should be Brachypelma albopilosum for the white ones and Brachypelma sp. "Gold Curly Hair" for the gold ones pending publication of taxonomic studies of these two species.
Agreed, absolutely.

I sent you and one other a PM years ago regarding these. Their spermatheca are completely different, which points to different species. I included pictures in that PM, but in my youthful wisdom I deleted both the conversation and pictures. If you have them, I'd be more than grateful if you were to post them again.
 

AphonopelmaTX

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
1,884
Agreed, absolutely.

I sent you and one other a PM years ago regarding these. Their spermatheca are completely different, which points to different species. I included pictures in that PM, but in my youthful wisdom I deleted both the conversation and pictures. If you have them, I'd be more than grateful if you were to post them again.
You remembered! I didn't know if mentioning that you were the source of the pictures was appropriate since you sent them to me in a PM. I saved them though and here they are. Your pictures are the evidence I refer to that these are different species.

Brachypelma sp. "Golden Curly Hair" (Honduras) ;)
B_albo_Honduras_EulersK_AB.jpg

Brachypelma albopilosum (Nicaragua)
B_albo_Nicaragua_EulersK_AB.jpg
 

EulersK

Arachnonomicon
Staff member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
3,291
You remembered! I didn't know if mentioning that you were the source of the pictures was appropriate since you sent them to me in a PM. I saved them though and here they are. Your pictures are the evidence I refer to that these are different species.

Brachypelma sp. "Golden Curly Hair" (Honduras) ;)
View attachment 303038

Brachypelma albopilosum (Nicaragua)
View attachment 303039
YES.

Frankly, I was too embarrassed to ask.

Okay, everyone, look at these. Differentiating between genitals is a huge part of taxonomy. It's literally one of the ways we tell apart very similar species.

The first picture is from my "hobby form" B. albopilosum, what would be known as a Honduran variant. I've got two others with the same spermatheca shape. The second is of the Nicaraguan variant. Notice anything different? They are likely different species.

No, this is a huge deal. This is primary evidence that they aren't what we think they are.

My belief? The "Honduras" variant has been hybridized to oblivion, resulting in this variance. I'm more than welcome varying opinions.
 

lostbrane

Arachnobaron
Joined
Jul 8, 2018
Messages
517
I suppose my question would be, what would the hobby variant have been hybridized with, "true" B. albopilosum, or something else (sorry don't know much about the species, let alone the confusion? around it)?
 

EulersK

Arachnonomicon
Staff member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
3,291
I suppose my question would be, what would the hobby variant have been hybridized with, "true" B. albopilosum, or something else?
Anything else. Brachypelma spp. readily breed amongst each other. People from the reptile hobby wanting to make "variants" but don't understand how speciation works.
 

Ianpcfauna

Arachnopeon
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
29
How new are the Nicaraguan are to the hobby?
She was probably an import ... Dropped a dud / bad sac. How I knew it was a female.
 

The Grym Reaper

Arachnoreaper
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
4,831
It should be Brachypelma albopilosum for the white ones and Brachypelma sp. "Gold Curly Hair" for the gold ones pending publication of taxonomic studies of these two species.
I'm sure I read something along the lines that the Honduran variant should actually be called B. aurapilosum (or something like that), I can't for the life of me remember where. Hopefully the two species get sorted with the revision and we can be done with all this "hobby/true form" nonsense.

I suppose my question would be, what would the hobby variant have been hybridized with, "true" B. albopilosum, or something else (sorry don't know much about the species, let alone the confusion? around it)?
Brachy species will readily breed with each other, it's generally assumed that they're all vagans hybrids though (at least over here anyway).

Funnily enough, there are probably a lot more boehmei/baumgarteni hybrids knocking about than albo hybrids but we don't have any of this "true/hobby form" nonsense for them
 

cold blood

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
13,379
It really diesnt matter what we call them, it matters that we identify them as seperate and dont pair them together.
 

docwade87

Arachnoknight
Joined
Mar 11, 2019
Messages
225
Based off of what y’all are showing and saying in previous posts, I would assume mine to be the gold/Honduran/ Brachypelma Spp.?
6C7C3922-3695-4F7E-AF15-383C1A3E3C33.jpeg BF23EDA5-F83C-46E7-AF34-29FF1BE3B65A.jpeg
 

AphonopelmaTX

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
1,884
I'm sure I read something along the lines that the Honduran variant should actually be called B. aurapilosum (or something like that), I can't for the life of me remember where. Hopefully the two species get sorted with the revision and we can be done with all this "hobby/true form" nonsense.
You are probably thinking of an article published in the journal of the British Tarantula Society by Ray Gabriel and Stuart Longhorn. Or at least read something somewhere that was based on that article. They published an article about these two types of Brachypelma albopilosum in which they stated something along the lines of how the scientific name of the gold colored ones would be more accurate as Brachypelma aureopilosum. "Aureo" meaning gold while "albo" meaning white. There were no nomenclature changes in that article. It was just an overview of how there are two different "curly hair" species in the hobby, how they are different, where they come from, and so on.
 
Top