- Joined
- Aug 15, 2002
- Messages
- 4,341
Okay, everyone knows the standard animal care myths (corn snakes eat people, horned frogs come from the sahara and iguanas like KD -- but only the really cheesy kind), but I want to know about the other myths.
Over the years, I have read a LOT about the care of various animals. Often, you get quite a good consensus across the board about how a certain animal should be kept. There are sometimes even scientific justifications for these points. Over the years, I have also learned who has the reputation when it comes to one species or another. You know, those wizards who have been captive breeding species x for twelve years where others just can't make it work. More and more, I am finding out that these people are breaking all the rules.
So I want to know what people have discovered -- either first or second hand -- that goes against the grain. I'll start off with some things I've come across. Keep in mind that these are not things that I necessarily condone.
- the animals that actualy need UV light may be only a small subset of the animals that are supposed to need it
- communal enclosures, even multi-species ones, may not be as bad as most people would have you believe
- humidity levels may or may not be as important as people think. high-humidity species may not need it and low-humidity species may need higher humidity
- the amount of space a creature needs may actualy be largely overestimated
- temps that are too cold may not be. temps that are too hot might also not be
That's all I can think of for now. I've left things intentionaly vague for now, as I have personal experiences with only a few. Anyhow, I'm looking for input on how your knowledg may deviate from the "common" knowledge.
Cheers,
Dave
Over the years, I have read a LOT about the care of various animals. Often, you get quite a good consensus across the board about how a certain animal should be kept. There are sometimes even scientific justifications for these points. Over the years, I have also learned who has the reputation when it comes to one species or another. You know, those wizards who have been captive breeding species x for twelve years where others just can't make it work. More and more, I am finding out that these people are breaking all the rules.
So I want to know what people have discovered -- either first or second hand -- that goes against the grain. I'll start off with some things I've come across. Keep in mind that these are not things that I necessarily condone.
- the animals that actualy need UV light may be only a small subset of the animals that are supposed to need it
- communal enclosures, even multi-species ones, may not be as bad as most people would have you believe
- humidity levels may or may not be as important as people think. high-humidity species may not need it and low-humidity species may need higher humidity
- the amount of space a creature needs may actualy be largely overestimated
- temps that are too cold may not be. temps that are too hot might also not be
That's all I can think of for now. I've left things intentionaly vague for now, as I have personal experiences with only a few. Anyhow, I'm looking for input on how your knowledg may deviate from the "common" knowledge.
Cheers,
Dave