C. sp Hati Hati
scorpsallday3

C. sp Hati Hati

Just picked up this T at an expo today along side a female O. violaceopes! I love these T’s
Looks like she wants to love you back, 😆.
I’m embarrassed to admit she wanted to love me so much that she bolted out at me right after this and snuck into a space under my sink… I had to rip apart my bathroom cabinetry to get her back 😅
 
I’m embarrassed to admit she wanted to love me so much that she bolted out at me right after this and snuck into a space under my sink… I had to rip apart my bathroom cabinetry to get her back 😅
They always wait until you've just taken that one last photo you couldn't pass up... 😜
 
Every reference to this spider online places it in the Cyriopagopus genus
Plenty of sources don’t and those that do are following outdated taxonomy. Cyriopagopus contains the fossorial Ts formerly in Haplopelma (which is invalid), and what you think of as Cyriopagopus (including this thing) - the arboreals - are either in a new genus (Omothymus) or, as in this case, currently unclassified.
 
Plenty of sources don’t and those that do are following outdated taxonomy. Cyriopagopus contains the fossorial Ts formerly in Haplopelma (which is invalid), and what you think of as Cyriopagopus (including this thing) - the arboreals - are either in a new genus (Omothymus) or, as in this case, currently unclassified.
Technically, for precision we could use just the umbrella subfamily name. I’m not sure about your hatihati, but mine so far and others I know who have experience with them will say they are largely fossorial if they have the right amount of substrate. I’m not a taxonomist and we don’t have comparative sequencing data for genus-level phylogeny yet, so I’ll just continue using Cyriopagopus for now. I’m not writing any papers 😂
 
Technically, for precision we could use just the umbrella subfamily name. I’m not sure about your hatihati, but mine so far and others I know who have experience with them will say they are largely fossorial if they have the right amount of substrate. I’m not a taxonomist and we don’t have comparative sequencing data for genus-level phylogeny yet, so I’ll just continue using Cyriopagopus for now. I’m not writing any papers 😂
All Ornithoctoninae are fossorial as juveniles and in captive settings if not given appropriate arboreal cover, doesn’t mean all of them are fossorial species.
 
All Ornithoctoninae are fossorial as juveniles and in captive settings if not given appropriate arboreal cover, doesn’t mean all of them are fossorial species.
I’m only referring to a single species behavior. Mine is no juvenile(Almost 6in dls) and stays hidden in its burrow. I have both a mature female C. lividus and mature female O. violaceopes. I’m sure I can determine which species prefers which substrate. My experience with the hatihati is that it’s behavior even at almost adult size it remains fossorial. Even when given the same vertical enclosure and setup originally as my violaceopes.
 

Media information

Category
Cyriopagopus
Added by
scorpsallday3
Date added
View count
229
Comment count
9
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Filename
IMG_4849.jpeg
File size
1.1 MB
Dimensions
962px x 1448px

Share this media

Top