Mystery tarantula
A guy

Mystery tarantula

It wasn't the species it was sold as and the dealer is also confused as to what it is.

1.25" and is already a mature female
The process of identification really is just a multiple choice question, but with a lot of possible answers you generate yourself including "none of the above." What I do with my own IDs is to first identify the subfamily, produce a list of all genera in the subfamily, then start crossing off those that are obviously not it. Afterwards, I have a list of fewer, but still a lot, of possible matches. Then I start looking at taxonomy papers for the remaining genera in the list and compare the descriptions to what I see in my microscope and start crossing off more from the list until I have even fewer possibilities. Once the tarantula is identified to genus, I start the whole process over again for the species within the genus. To get accurate results, you have to assume the scientific name on the price list of every dealer is wrong and approach an identification without bias.

Simple enough, right? o_O
o_O Simple enough.

In fact, it's even simpler because we can't use a microscope here in cyber space :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 

Media information

Category
Tarantula Identification
Added by
A guy
Date added
View count
503
Comment count
11
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Device
samsung SM-G998W
Aperture
ƒ/2.2
Focal length
2.2 mm
Exposure time
1/60
ISO
80
Filename
20230305_155316.jpg
File size
2.2 MB
Date taken
Sun, 05 March 2023 3:53 PM
Dimensions
4000px x 3000px

Share this media

Top