I have posted a pic of this spider before and that caused some debate. Was feeding some of the Ts and got a nice shot (without and with flash) so woukd be rude not to share ha ha.
Thank you for reply. That's one that was on the list. There were many other suggestions but rather than sway people, will just see how the thread turns out.
Thanks again
Those obvious brushes of longer setae at the back edge of the carapace does not fit to P sp. MACHALA or any other Pamphobeteus.
As I said before, check it (or let check) if there are stridulatory bristles.
Those obvious brushes of longer setae at the back edge of the carapace does not fit to P sp. MACHALA or any other Pamphobeteus.
As I said before, check it (or let check) if there are stridulatory bristles.
May still be too small for those? I certainly can't make any out atm with a) my ageing eyesight or b) with camera I have. It does jump about like a loon when disturbed rather than stridulating so don't know if that helps with any characteristic traits for any specific genus?
No, it is not to small.
You cant see it, because within the Theraphosinae these stridulatory bristles could be located at the Coxa and Trochanter of the leg 1 and 2 or the pedipalps. It needs a examination of an old skin under a microscop.
The presence of such srtidulatory bristles means not that you must automaticly hear any noises (for example the genus Grammostola).
If you have a old skin and need help, you can wirte me a pm.
No, it is not to small.
You cant see it, because within the Theraphosinae these stridulatory bristles could be located at the Coxa and Trochanter of the leg 1 and 2 or the pedipalps. It needs a examination of an old skin under a microscop.
The presence of such srtidulatory bristles means not that you must automaticly hear any noises (for example the genus Grammostola).
If you have a old skin and need help, you can wirte me a pm.
N5 or N6
old picture, i am just posting it to use as a reference
probably the most vibrant stage...
as you can see P. sp. "machala" look quite different at that size range
I agree with @c.h.esteban that it likely is not a pamphobeteus at all. Though unlike him, i am just going by looks, i am no expert. Do tell us the results, if that is alright.
N5 or N6
old picture, i am just posting it to use as a reference
probably the most vibrant stage...
as you can see P. sp. "machala" look quite different at that size range
I agree with @c.h.esteban that it likely is not a pamphobeteus at all. Though unlike him, i am just going by looks, i am no expert. Do tell us the results, if that is alright.
Thank you . From those pics yes there is a lot in common.. P cancerides was another strong contender. I will deffo keep this going and also try and get a salvageable moult nest time so that I can share with @c.h.esteban amongst others.
Thanks again
Hello there, why not take a few seconds to register on our forums and become part of the community? Just click here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.