Can someone help ID?
The Spider House

Can someone help ID?

I have posted a pic of this spider before and that caused some debate. Was feeding some of the Ts and got a nice shot (without and with flash) so woukd be rude not to share ha ha.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thank you 😊
Those obvious brushes of longer setae at the back edge of the carapace does not fit to P sp. MACHALA or any other Pamphobeteus.
As I said before, check it (or let check) if there are stridulatory bristles.
 
Those obvious brushes of longer setae at the back edge of the carapace does not fit to P sp. MACHALA or any other Pamphobeteus.
As I said before, check it (or let check) if there are stridulatory bristles.
May still be too small for those? I certainly can't make any out atm with a) my ageing eyesight or b) with camera I have. It does jump about like a loon when disturbed rather than stridulating so don't know if that helps with any characteristic traits for any specific genus?
 
No, it is not to small.
You cant see it, because within the Theraphosinae these stridulatory bristles could be located at the Coxa and Trochanter of the leg 1 and 2 or the pedipalps. It needs a examination of an old skin under a microscop.
The presence of such srtidulatory bristles means not that you must automaticly hear any noises (for example the genus Grammostola).

If you have a old skin and need help, you can wirte me a pm.
 
No, it is not to small.
You cant see it, because within the Theraphosinae these stridulatory bristles could be located at the Coxa and Trochanter of the leg 1 and 2 or the pedipalps. It needs a examination of an old skin under a microscop.
The presence of such srtidulatory bristles means not that you must automaticly hear any noises (for example the genus Grammostola).

If you have a old skin and need help, you can wirte me a pm.
Thank you so much. Unfortunately moulted recently and ate it! 😡

Will intercept next time..I have an electronic microscope so will deffo reach out to you.

Thank you very much. Very helpful. 😊
 
~6" P. sp. machala as a comparison

~4" P. sp. machala

as you can see P. sp. "machala" look quite different at that size range

I agree with @c.h.esteban that it likely is not a pamphobeteus at all. Though unlike him, i am just going by looks, i am no expert. Do tell us the results, if that is alright.
 
~6" P. sp. machala as a comparison

~4" P. sp. machala

as you can see P. sp. "machala" look quite different at that size range

I agree with @c.h.esteban that it likely is not a pamphobeteus at all. Though unlike him, i am just going by looks, i am no expert. Do tell us the results, if that is alright.
I will as very interested to find out. Thank you for the reference pics 👍
 
The more i look at it, the more i think it could be a young Phormictopus cancerides. Who knows.

and a few example pictures i found, these are not mine:

Thank you 😊. From those pics yes there is a lot in common.. P cancerides was another strong contender. I will deffo keep this going and also try and get a salvageable moult nest time so that I can share with @c.h.esteban amongst others.
Thanks again 👍
 

Media information

Category
Tarantula Identification
Added by
The Spider House
Date added
View count
697
Comment count
17
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Filename
20220415_114015.jpg
File size
940.7 KB
Dimensions
2880px x 2880px

Share this media

Top