A. avic.?
CyclingSam

A. avic.?

The store had it labeled as A. avic. I am now not so sure.
So its still eating then :)

Looks like an avic. to me but almost all of this genus cant be photo ID'd
 
People can guess, and they will, but that is all it is... guessing. If it was labelled as an A. avic, then you probably will never know otherwise.
Unless you were planning on breeding, which wouldn't be a good idea unless you can trust the source, then it doesn't really matter that much. They're all kept the same way and they are all lovely. :)
 
Vanessa raises a good point. My A. metallica did not have white going down the length of the setae, just the tips. All the fresh molt pics I posted of mine didn't have red as this one does, and just the typical fiber optic setae found in A. metallica and some other species of Avics. Again, w/few exceptions, you can't ID Avics via pics.
 
Avicularia sp Guyana, also it can be one of those metallica and av. av. hybrids: they're really wide spread among american keepers, because there was no clear metallica males here. It should be noticed that all avicularia species from guyana have red abdominal hairs and white leg hairs. Av. av. and av. sp Guyana are almost the same tarantula with small red and white hair differences. True av. metallica is a full blue tarantula and has no red hairs at all. Carapace colors, that are almost azure or aquamarine, don't matter, but sometimes help to understand who were the parents: one species or two different.
 
@Cloud Chaser How do you know that hybrid is really widespread? Have you any scientific data to support this, or speculation based on anecdotal evidence?
 

Media information

Category
Tarantula Identification
Added by
CyclingSam
Date added
View count
1,820
Comment count
7
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Device
SAMSUNG SM-G360P
Aperture
ƒ/2.6
Focal length
3.3 mm
Exposure time
1/141
ISO
80
Filename
20161108_125913.jpg
File size
2.4 MB
Date taken
Tue, 08 November 2016 12:59 PM
Dimensions
2576px x 1932px

Share this media

Top