No problem!
The most evident part is the "dark triangle" that sits inbetween the two anterior book lungs,which would be the Epiandrous fusillae,which is a direct,solid male indicator. Besides that,here's a little drawing i made to show the differences that i look for for G.pulchra at this size:
And here's my female of the exact same size,for comparison:
This can be applied to most new world terrestrials
I've found that a lot of african Ts show barely any characteristics like NW Terrestrials do at these sizes,for example.
This can be applied to most new world terrestrials
I've found that a lot of african Ts show barely any characteristics like NW Terrestrials do at these sizes,for example.
This can be applied to most new world terrestrials
I've found that a lot of african Ts show barely any characteristics like NW Terrestrials do at these sizes,for example.
Is it possible to get a pouch on males? I have a 2inch rosea that from the moult pic ppl said male but has a pouch not a triangle now I am wondering if its possible the moult was mis sexed or if males can have pouches
Is it possible to get a pouch on males? I have a 2inch rosea that from the moult pic ppl said male but has a pouch not a triangle now I am wondering if its possible the moult was mis sexed or if males can have pouches
Sometimes the strong characteristics dont show until later sizes,and these can vary by specimen. Sometimes its very subtle,which also depends on the species,thats why molt sexing is the way to go.
But anyway,i remember that molt pic,and looking back on it now im still not 100% convinced its a male. Do you still have the molt intact by any chance?
Hello there, why not take a few seconds to register on our forums and become part of the community? Just click here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
