20230217_222742.jpg
Leggygorl

20230217_222742.jpg

Pamphobetues Solaris
I don't see anything in any of the 4 pics that leads me to say it's female. It looks like a pretty small molt, though, so perhaps under stronger magnification it would be different?
 
I don't see anything in any of the 4 pics that leads me to say it's female. It looks like a pretty small molt, though, so perhaps under stronger magnification it would be different?
Yeah I was strongly leaning male, but then another group had me second guessing. I was told to check next molt to confirm. Already have people interested in buying it for breeding programs, but want to make sure I make a good decision... plus I love this spider and they're not easy to come by.
 
Yeah I was strongly leaning male, but then another group had me second guessing. I was told to check next molt to confirm. Already have people interested in buying it for breeding programs, but want to make sure I make a good decision... plus I love this spider and they're not easy to come by.
How big is it? That'll help to know if spermathecae should be clearly visible by now or not.
 
It's about 4 inches now.
Then it's definitely a male. At 4" the spermathecae would be well enough developed to be visible to the naked eye, let alone under magnification. See below example - different Pampho species, but close to the same size as yours, and you can see how big the spermathecae are already:
 

Media information

Category
Spermathecae sexing (Molts)
Added by
Leggygorl
Date added
View count
240
Comment count
5
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Device
samsung SM-S901U
Aperture
ƒ/1.8
Focal length
5.4 mm
Exposure time
1/912
ISO
40
Filename
20230217_222742.jpg
File size
2 MB
Date taken
Fri, 17 February 2023 10:27 PM
Dimensions
4000px x 3000px

Share this media

Top