1. The animals that where initially sold as P.smithi, where later regarded as P.gregoryi and in the end they where identified as P.exitialis.
2. The animal in the picture is probably P.cavimanus and is definetly not P.exitialis, because of the different overall coloration. Because coloration isn't a very strong taxonomical key point, yuo should also check the lenght of the scorpion (tip aculeus to edge of carapace) and the granulation on the carapace and chela.
Too bad you don't have locality data, this makes Id'ing this specimen harder, besides the taxononomical nightmares.
Cheers, Michiel
2. The animal in the picture is probably P.cavimanus and is definetly not P.exitialis, because of the different overall coloration. Because coloration isn't a very strong taxonomical key point, yuo should also check the lenght of the scorpion (tip aculeus to edge of carapace) and the granulation on the carapace and chela.
Too bad you don't have locality data, this makes Id'ing this specimen harder, besides the taxononomical nightmares.
Cheers, Michiel