- Joined
- Jan 19, 2014
- Messages
- 13,383
Or humans.If anything is deserving of the moniker "birdeater" it would have to be Nephila species!
I'm a polish birdeater...hehe
Or humans.If anything is deserving of the moniker "birdeater" it would have to be Nephila species!
While one could call humans birdeaters, I think I'd prefer to stick with the same naming pattern as is used for tarantulas and name us for the largest possible prey item we could devour, rather than one of the most common. I shall henceforth be known as a California bluewhaleeater! Ok, sure - I've never actually eaten a blue whale, but I'm sure there are some people, somewhere, who have!Or humans.
I'm a polish birdeater...hehe
No, I would hear it at the expos all the time - Golden Knee Birdeater. Technically, they are a Birdeater if you subscribe to the SA terrestrial >5" definition.Are these people reptile people? Or was this during a specific time period? Like more than a decade ago? Like @korg said, I’ve never once heard G. pulchripes referred to as some kind of birdeater species.
Don't worry, that video is posted from CNN which means it's definitely fake anyways.Birdeater is sorta offensive. I mean, I kept zebra finches back in the 80's -- the thought of a snake or T consuming one -- just makes me want to vomit.
I know it's just exaggerating a T's size to call them that -- but c'mon -- to me, a bird is a sentient feeling thinking creature. I can't control what Ts do in the wild, but I can't help but think bird eating (or mouse eating) is (hopefully) more rare than previous believed. (Maybe some freak incident where some baby chick fell from a nest?)
And thank you again @chanda for the disturbing baby opossum eating video.
I vote giganticus or dinnerplaticus for large Ts. Seriously.
Oh good, so it's not just me!Baboon and Earth Tiger don't bother me anywhere near as much as Birdeater does
@VanisherIn my opinion only aviculria sp. should be considered birdeaters sicne they have been seen eating baby birds but even then the term itself can be misleading and such an occurrence is actually quite rare, as they’re only sometimes seen eating birds.
I think it bothers me as much as it does because it implies that they will get to the same size as a Goliath Birdeater. I would speak to people who would make statements that they would get to 10-12" and were shocked when I told them that wasn't the case and they would probably top out at around 7". I even had a few say "Then why are they called Birdeater?"Oh good, so it's not just me!
I don't use Earth Tiger (though I think it is an awesome name), but I do use Baboon... I feel like there isn't any question with those two about which species are included, whereas "birdeater" is just a can of confused worms.
This is widespread misconception and I thought that for long time too, but in fact word avicularia does not contain any reference to "eater/eating/...".@Vanisher
Avicularia sp are called 'birdeaters' because their genus name, Avicularia, means 'eater of birds', not necessarily because they eat birds
They are called "baboon spiders" because the scopulae pads on their feet resembles the pads on the fingers/feet of the baboons. At least that is what I have heard.Baboon is a a clear reference to a location
I also thought it referred to that until I read that it stems from avicula, the diminutive form of avis ("little bird").This is widespread misconception and I thought that for long time too, but in fact word avicularia does not contain any reference to "eater/eating/...".
This is widespread misconception and I thought that for long time too, but in fact word avicularia does not contain any reference to "eater/eating/...".
They were considered to feed on birds since Merian's reports and paintings. Linnaeus, author of the name avicularia (note it was originaly species name, in combination Aranea avicularia and later Mygale avicularia, genus Avicularia was created 60 years later) states about it: "Lives in America, preys on small birds, insects.". Later authors repeated this info, including Lamarck who created genus of this name.
@Patherophis this ^^I also thought it referred to that until I read that it stems from avicula, the diminutive form of avis ("little bird").
I love that Linnaeus also used that that word in sentence I cited, "Habitat in America, insidiatur Avilculis, Insectis.".I also thought it referred to that until I read that it stems from avicula, the diminutive form of avis ("little bird").
I read version about it being because baboons were observed to hunt some. I really hate common names.They are called "baboon spiders" because the scopulae pads on their feet resembles the pads on the fingers/feet of the baboons. At least that is what I have heard.
I worked with a man originally from Zimbabwe who has watched baboons digging them up and eating them and that was the explanation that I remember being given many years ago for the term. He says they go berserk over them. I guess we're not the only primate who finds them to be a delicacy.I read version about it being because baboons were observed to hunt some.
I do, too. Aside from baboon, Orange Bob, and GBB... I won't use any and remain ignorant to them. I don't consider baboon a common name so much as a term for a type of tarantula from a specific area.I really hate common names.
If You do not trust me, what about Michael Jacobi: Scientific names, whare do they come from?Avicularia = Avi (birds) + cularia (eater).