TheInv4sion
Arachnobaron
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2015
- Messages
- 485
In my defense I don't kill house flies. I just cuss at it when it buzzes in my ear or accidentally bumps into me :XOk, I can see that. Maybe for spreading diseases mosquitoes just deserve a little killing. But house flies and other 'pests' don't all spread diseases. We kill them just the same and don't feel any guilt when we do so. We use zap lights, sprays, other animals etc. to get rid of what we perceive as pests with no remorse regardless of the methods used for their eradication. So if they perceive tarantulas as pests why would 'Kill them with fire' be any different then 'Zap them with electricity'?
I was helping my Mom in the garden once when I was a kid. We were weeding a beet bed and I didn't understand why some of the plants were 'good' and some were 'weeds'. So I asked her how she decided which plants were which. She said, "The weeds are plants that are not where we want them to be. No plants are inherently bad but when they are growing counter to what we want then they are weeds". She also noted that what is a weed to one person can be a good plant to another. It is how we perceive and add value to them that makes them one or the other to us.
Again, I don't advocate torturing any animal for fun or otherwise. I also don't think everyone is going to place the same value on the same things. We all assign a lot of value to our tarantulas so they matter more to us. You said "It is morally reprehensible to kill for the sole intention of torturing an animal" and that is true. If they bug zapped a tarantula quickly would that be acceptable? If they didn't have a torturing intent and just wanted the pest gone how is that different then wanting the dreaded house fly gone? Again, if we have no problem with 'Zap them with electricity' then can we complain about "Kill them with fire'?