You are right, I apologize, I went off the notion before that it was a Plesiopelma longisternale because someone in my group thought it was very similar without looking at location. I was able to narrow it down to the Plesiopelma genus because it looked very similar to specimens I've seen. Can it be infered that it can be called Plesiopelma sp. then?Cool, thank you very much for hint of the family Plesiopelma.
Why do you think it could be Plesiopelma longisternale as they are found in Argentina and Uruguay whichis quite far away and with a lot of barriers in between ?
Kind regards, Philip