smithi or smithii

[julesaussies]

Does anyone know the correct spelling for the B. smithi(i)?? i have seen it written as both and was wondering if one was more correct. i realize either more than gets the point across. i guess its just my OCD that wants to make it perfect... LOL

 

[ScorpDemon]

I do believe that one "i" will suffice.

 

[Alice]

and me too

 

[PhilR]

Correct current scientific name is Brachypelma smithi (F. O. P.-Cambridge, 1897)

 

[julesaussies]

Correct current scientific name is Brachypelma smithi (F. O. P.-Cambridge, 1897)

Thank you!

 

[Moltar]

Brichipilmii Simiithiii

 

[PhilR]

Thank you!

No problem

Brichipilmii Simiithiii

 

[P. Novak]

won't hurt to add mine.. Brachypelma smithi... just to confirm it a little bit more.

Now the one to really consider is...

Aphonopelma seemanni or Aphonopelma seemani. I always wrote it Aphonopelma seemanni, but I've seen many people write it as Aphonopelma seemani. Which is it? Rick West has it as Aphonopelma seemanni I believe.

 

[Bothrops]

won't hurt to add mine.. Brachypelma smithi... just to confirm it a little bit more.

Now the one to really consider is...

Aphonopelma seemanni or Aphonopelma seemani. I always wrote it Aphonopelma seemanni, but I've seen many people write it as Aphonopelma seemani. Which is it? Rick West has it as Aphonopelma seemanni I believe.

Aphonopelma seemanni is the correct one I think. I always write it that way.

 

[PhilR]

won't hurt to add mine.. Brachypelma smithi... just to confirm it a little bit more.

Now the one to really consider is...

Aphonopelma seemanni or Aphonopelma seemani. I always wrote it Aphonopelma seemanni, but I've seen many people write it as Aphonopelma seemani. Which is it? Rick West has it as Aphonopelma seemanni I believe.

Aphonopelma seemanni (F. O. P.-Cambridge, 1897) according to the WSC

 

[phil jones]

i to have at A - SEEMANNI - and a B- SMITHI phil