seladonia

kiffnie

Arachnosquire
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
100
Why is everyone suddenly selling T. seladonia? Did something change, or are they just making enough money selling them to pay their legal fees? I know USFWS doesn't have the staff to deal with this, but they can still make an example of someone...
 

Theneil

Arachnoprince
Joined
Oct 18, 2017
Messages
1,292
Why is everyone suddenly selling T. seladonia? Did something change, or are they just making enough money selling them to pay their legal fees? I know USFWS doesn't have the staff to deal with this, but they can still make an example of someone...
T. selidonia don’t have any species specific rules that apply just to them. All regulation for them applies across the board to every Brailian endemic species (P. sazimai, G. pulchra, D. diamantinensis, etc) and most people never stopped selling those, so i don’t know why they haven't been more available... My guess is that everybody was just scared somwthing would happen, and then once somebody mustered up the courage to sell and nothing happened, everybody else jumped on the gravy train.

Of course, this is pure speculation and i cannot speak on behalf of those selling selidonia, because i haven't ever had one for me, let alone any to sell...
 

kiffnie

Arachnosquire
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
100
T. selidonia don’t have any species specific rules that apply just to them. All regulation for them applies across the board to every Brailian endemic species (P. sazimai, G. pulchra, D. diamantinensis, etc) and most people never stopped selling those, so i don’t know why they haven't been more available... My guess is that everybody was just scared somwthing would happen, and then once somebody mustered up the courage to sell and nothing happened, everybody else jumped on the gravy train.

Of course, this is pure speculation and i cannot speak on behalf of those selling selidonia, because i haven't ever had one for me, let alone any to sell...
Since T. seladonia was the reason for the Brazilian endemic ban/situation, I guess that I figured people would be more cautious. A newly described species in the hobby way too soon is just obvious smuggling. I guess I don't understand why people want to own it, considering how it entered the hobby.
 

jrh3

Araneae
Arachnosupporter +
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
1,334
Since T. seladonia was the reason for the Brazilian endemic ban/situation, I guess that I figured people would be more cautious. A newly described species in the hobby way too soon is just obvious smuggling. I guess I don't understand why people want to own it, considering how it entered the hobby.
You think T. Seladonia is the only species that entered the hobby this way? :bookworm:
 

kiffnie

Arachnosquire
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
100
You think T. Seladonia is the only species that entered the hobby this way? :bookworm:
No of course not, but it is the recent one with lots of hype and press, and is THE reason that we can't import geniculata and parahybana anymore.
 

Feral

Arachnobaron
Active Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2019
Messages
407
There is absolutely NO REASON we would ever need to import these species (and MANY others).
I want to agree with you, I do... And in an ideal world you'd be inarguably right. But the way I see people carelessly breed, especially breeding animals from the same source/breeder or even breeding sac mates (?!), I wouldn't be surprised at all if we start seeing problems in our captive stock from poor breeding practices over time. This hobby is still relatively new, even if forty or fifty years old, and having avoided problems so far doesn't guarantee a lack of problems... Time and repetition compounds genetic issues over generations, practices like inbreeding and linebreeding will bite us sooner or later. Limited gene pools can be dicey. As the hobby grows, the problem grows. IMO, we need to be very careful when choosing who to breed to whom, doubly so with species we know we're unlikely to be able to refresh with new genes from wild-caught stock because of collection bans (like poecies) or import bans (like pulchra or especially seladonia), thricely so with species of which we already have too few individuals (like seladonia) and thus very limited genetic variety. And also definitely never ever breed sac mates!
 
Last edited:

kiffnie

Arachnosquire
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
100
I guess that I am the only one that sees seladonia as the poster child for the greed and must-have mentality of the hobby. Fair enough. I will leave the post up a few more days and then slink back into my "old-timer" grouchy hole.
 

AphonopelmaTX

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
1,821
Mod Note

This is a reminder that posting who has T. seldonia and how much they are selling them for is considered a violation of the forum's advertising rules. Any posts in violation will be deleted.
 

lostbrane

Arachnobaron
Joined
Jul 8, 2018
Messages
517
Considering that that one shipment got seized, I am surprised as well.

I suppose we shall see.
 

cold blood

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
13,250
I want to agree with you, I do... And in an ideal world you'd be inarguably right. But the way I see people carelessly breed, especially
Im not talking about an ideal world, im talking the real world.

Who on gods green earth is going to fork over huge import fees or smuggle in species that are already so abundant in the hobby that theyre practically valueless...like Lasiodora.
 

Feral

Arachnobaron
Active Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2019
Messages
407
Im not talking about an ideal world, im talking the real world.

Who on gods green earth is going to fork over huge import fees or smuggle in species that are already so abundant in the hobby that theyre practically valueless...like Lasiodora.
Yes, I see your point that we have plenty of those Ts (Lasiodora, in your example, so I'll use that one too) for everyone to pretty much have as many as they want. So why import what is already plentiful, you ask. As pets, yes, I totally see your point. But breeding is different... a large captive population is not necessarily a genetically diverse population. The individuals of any captive population can basically only be as genetically diverse as however many wild-caught individuals were bred into the captive population. As an extreme example, all of the magillion LPs we have in the hobby today could have (theoretically) all descended from just two wild-caught specimens, given enough generations, thereby making the genetic diversity of their captive population about nil. That's what exponentialism is.

Since Brazil says it has never allowed legal exportation of any species (and never will, they say) then they'd all have to be smuggled and that means their captive numbers would have been limited by that fact (smuggling). So I suspect your example of LPs are far less genetically diverse than hobbyists think, and then on top of that they've been indiscriminately bred and inbred for a few decades now... and then if we can't get new wild genes in the future, well... I wouldn't at all be surprised if in the next couple decades they (and other species) start having health/hardiness problems because of all that.

I definitely agree that we shouldn't be taking spoods (like LPs and just about all other species) from the wild at this point. I definitely agree there. But that means we gotta take care of what we got. So my point is if we want to CONTINUE having healthy captive individuals in the hobby for many many years to come without having to introduce wild genes, then we can't keep inbreeding with impunity.
 

AphonopelmaTX

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2004
Messages
1,821
Im not talking about an ideal world, im talking the real world.

Who on gods green earth is going to fork over huge import fees or smuggle in species that are already so abundant in the hobby that theyre practically valueless...like Lasiodora.
In the real world, adults sell better than spiderlings so I bet Lasiodora adults are still taken from the wild. Besides, people are forking over the import fees for WC Avicularia avicularia, Aphonopelma seemanni (and its look-alike), T. albopilosum, and so on. Who knows how many of those spiderlings of abundant species we have in the USA are actually imported from Europe or where Europe is getting the adults to produce the spiderlings. It's hard to tell from a price list what's imported and what is captive bred and born in the USA. Unless it is an American first, then the breeders and/ or sellers are going to brag about it.
 

cold blood

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
13,250
In the real world, adults sell better than spiderlings so I bet Lasiodora adults are still taken from the wild. Besides, people are forking over the import fees for WC Avicularia avicularia, Aphonopelma seemanni (and its look-alike), T. albopilosum, and so on. Who knows how many of those spiderlings of abundant species we have in the USA are actually imported from Europe or where Europe is getting the adults to produce the spiderlings. It's hard to tell from a price list what's imported and what is captive bred and born in the USA. Unless it is an American first, then the breeders and/ or sellers are going to brag about it.
Yeah, this probably isnt the first time i have shown my naivety on the import/smuggling subject. Great point with imported avics.
 

PanzoN88

Arachnodemon
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
713
I asked someone about this subject a few days ago, I can ask if it would be ok to post the Instagram message.
 

Theneil

Arachnoprince
Joined
Oct 18, 2017
Messages
1,292
Im not talking about an ideal world, im talking the real world.

Who on gods green earth is going to fork over huge import fees or smuggle in species that are already so abundant in the hobby that theyre practically valueless...like Lasiodora.
If youbare already paying a few hundred in import fees and a couple grand in shipping on other species, you might as well add some others too if the price is right. I don’y think people are doing thr import FOR the “worthless” species, just adding some to the import (for very minimal cost)
 
Top