- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
- Messages
- 3,298
The Discussion subforum has become plagued with stickies. When viewing on a mobile device, I have to scroll significantly before I get past the stickies. In fact, even on a computer, the list of stickies actually fills the screen. There’s an old saying that goes something like this: Highlighting everything on the page means nothing is highlighted. This is arguably the most important subforum on this site, and it’s bogged down with irrelevant threads that are perpetually at the top of the list.
I truly believe that Arachnoboards is one of the leaders when it comes to tarantula husbandry on the internet, and this is not something that should be taken lightly. With that responsibility comes the obligation to stay relevant, and to portray that, I feel that some threads should be removed from the top of the forum. I’d like to get a discussion going on this, and perhaps have others throw in suggestions of their own.
The threads that I’d like to see removed (or consolidated) from this important section are:
Iridopelma, Pachistopelma, Typhochlaena Revision
The last relevant post was three years ago, and this thread is regarding the revision of three genera. While I admit that this is important, it would be much more beneficial to have a thread about all revisions and not articles posted over four years ago.
Dyskinetic syndrome (dks)
There is another stickie already that discusses DKS, and this thread was abandoned way back in 2012. The thread is full of nothing but speculation, guesswork, or uncited claims. It has no place at the top of a page dedicated to the scientific study of tarantulas.
List of scientific articles about tarantulas published in 2012 [updated 15 March 2012]
Now, this thread actually isn’t bad. But I don’t understand the point of having articles for only 2012 – why not have a thread for all scientific articles? I have seen several great articles this year alone get buried in this very forum.
I truly believe that Arachnoboards is one of the leaders when it comes to tarantula husbandry on the internet, and this is not something that should be taken lightly. With that responsibility comes the obligation to stay relevant, and to portray that, I feel that some threads should be removed from the top of the forum. I’d like to get a discussion going on this, and perhaps have others throw in suggestions of their own.
The threads that I’d like to see removed (or consolidated) from this important section are:
Iridopelma, Pachistopelma, Typhochlaena Revision
The last relevant post was three years ago, and this thread is regarding the revision of three genera. While I admit that this is important, it would be much more beneficial to have a thread about all revisions and not articles posted over four years ago.
Dyskinetic syndrome (dks)
There is another stickie already that discusses DKS, and this thread was abandoned way back in 2012. The thread is full of nothing but speculation, guesswork, or uncited claims. It has no place at the top of a page dedicated to the scientific study of tarantulas.
List of scientific articles about tarantulas published in 2012 [updated 15 March 2012]
Now, this thread actually isn’t bad. But I don’t understand the point of having articles for only 2012 – why not have a thread for all scientific articles? I have seen several great articles this year alone get buried in this very forum.