That is the type of images. I don't really trust color on images because light, photoshop, etc. And with these images, J guess that they look alike on certain light conditions. These pictures might be bad tooI’ve owned the former, and never thought they looked like the latter. Curious what images you’re looking at.
You're right - you can't go by coloration alone. The Cyriopagopus has thicker, stockier legs and lacks the long setae on the legs like the Omothymus has. As for coloration, I always thought the C. sp. Hati Hati looked more gray than blue/purple, with the exception of in bright light shortly after a molt. The C. violaceopes almost always has some shade of blue/purple visible to the naked eye (once they get their adult colors).That is the type of images. I don't really trust color on images because light, photoshop, etc. And with these images, J guess that they look alike on certain light conditions. These pictures might be bad too
<edit>
images are flawed, you can look up a t and end up seeing many different species. Hati hati and violaceopes actually look VERY different....voioaceopes are bright purple.from the images I found on the internet,
no imagesThat is the type of images. I don't really trust color on images because light, photoshop, etc. And with these images, J guess that they look alike on certain light conditions. These pictures might be bad too
<edit>
Screenshots of Google images are a no-no, so they got the old yoink. Looked like the T's in question, though!no images