- Joined
- Feb 25, 2004
- Messages
- 71
Poecilotheria spec. "mallamalai"
http://www.poecilotheria.com/berichtepoecilotheria_mallamalai_female.htm
http://www.poecilotheria.com/berichtepoecilotheria_mallamalai_female.htm
Poecilotheria spec. "mallamalai"
http://www.poecilotheria.com/berichtepoecilotheria_mallamalai_female.htm
Yep theres me reading with no sleep again you are right....![]()
I wonder how much longer it is till pokies are like avics.![]()
That was Poecilotheria hanumavilasumica, wasn't it?I believe this species was discovered by Andrew M Smith and Paul Carpenter back in 2004 I am not 100% sure of this but the species is endangered and only dead specimens remain from what was collected.
I cannot say this is right but I remember reading an artical on it in the BTS downloads maybe someone else can shed more light on it
Another P. regalis lookalike.Nice looking spider nonetheless.
I have a regalis...can some one explain the charateristics of this Pokie that make it NOT a regalis? Cause I'm confused.
I was certainly wondering about that picture myself, after reading the description... didn't seem to fit.The interesting bit is that the paper clearly describes a formosa ... The nallamalai hills are a known collecting site for regalis which may be why the poecilotheria.com has shown a regalis ... even though the paper shows a formosa ...
"TTstinger", the spider you mention is not the one being discussed here. As David mentions, you are refering to P. hanumavilasumica, which is now in the hobby btw.That was Poecilotheria hanumavilasumica, wasn't it?I believe this species was discovered by Andrew M Smith and Paul Carpenter back in 2004 I am not 100% sure of this but the species is endangered and only dead specimens remain from what was collected.
I cannot say this is right but I remember reading an artical on it in the BTS downloads maybe someone else can shed more light on it