My macro photography introduction

Nerri1029

Chief Cook n Bottlewasher
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 29, 2004
Messages
1,725
After some trial and MUCH error.

I came up with these.

New equipment:
- reversal adaptor.
- ring light 80 LED

and of course my SONY A300









Should get better from here out :)
 

arachnocat

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
792
WOW! Those are great! I got a camera this year just for taking macros. I haven't shot anything I'm really proud of yet but my pic of a 1/2" mantidfly came out pretty well so I'm exited to see if I can do better :D
I'm still learning but macros are fun.
 

Choobaine

Arachnobaron
Old Timer
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
561
oh that is GORGEOUS! Good sir you have some awesome gear. Please do show more as soon as you take some!
I love macro shots, I've been messing around myself -> clicky but they're done with no more than an Olympus FE120 and pale horribly in comparison to your masterful work!
 

Pulk

Arachnoprince
Old Timer
Joined
May 10, 2007
Messages
1,049
try using a different background/substrate ;)
 

Nerri1029

Chief Cook n Bottlewasher
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 29, 2004
Messages
1,725
try using a different background/substrate ;)
THANKS.

It was a total impromptu shoot in my office at work, but that should help later.

I'm fully manual when I shoot macro since I'm using an old 50mm lens reversed and the camera has no input from the lens.
 

TheDarkFinder

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 18, 2004
Messages
923
given what you are shooting with they are ok.

Your biggest problem is getting equal and complete light. The first one you can tell it is a ring light, the second one the fstop is too wide. And the last one, well the exposure was just off. Oh and you have a noise problem, If the A300 stay away from anything over at or over 400.
 

Nerri1029

Chief Cook n Bottlewasher
Old Timer
Joined
Sep 29, 2004
Messages
1,725
given what you are shooting with they are ok.

Your biggest problem is getting equal and complete light. The first one you can tell it is a ring light, the second one the fstop is too wide. And the last one, well the exposure was just off. Oh and you have a noise problem, If the A300 stay away from anything over at or over 400.
OK thanks but you'll have to do better.

- I realize it's not pro equipment.

- How can you "tell it's a ring light" ?

- As for exposure yes.. I'm all manual and I'm changing f-stops and reshooting ( baby steps here, right now )

- How do you tell I have a noise prob? could it be the anti-shake?
I think I had the ISO at 100.
 

DrAce

Arachnodemon
Old Timer
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
764
Is the bug on toilet paper?

I think I can even tell that it's 2-ply! :razz:

Seriously, I'd be happy with those images.
 

TheDarkFinder

Arachnoangel
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 18, 2004
Messages
923
OK thanks but you'll have to do better.

- I realize it's not pro equipment.

- How can you "tell it's a ring light" ?

- As for exposure yes.. I'm all manual and I'm changing f-stops and reshooting ( baby steps here, right now )

- How do you tell I have a noise prob? could it be the anti-shake?
I think I had the ISO at 100.
Ok so at 100 I am probably seeing compression artifact.

As for the ring light, yes it looks like a ring light, which is good and bad. Ring lights work really well for 1:1 or 1:2 but at 1:5 the light drops off pretty fast.
 
Top