- Joined
- Apr 4, 2004
- Messages
- 836
I vote very real
My friend takes courses on digital photography at Acedeny of intsutue of sanfrasico and he say its real. I showed him the pic and he said it would be very difficult for anyone to blend the image that perfectly where the pede is gripping his finger. Also that if you compare the reflection on the pedes backend and head section to the shadows on his shirt the the angles match up as if they came from the same light source, the way the light trasfers from the rear of the to the tip of his index, and the shadow between the index and thumb would also be very hard to fake. And he says the final indication it is real is that the grain of the image on the pede and the grain of the rest of the image is very consistant. But there are two spots where it looks blurred: one with a blurry patch between the third and fourth leg, and the blurryness of the middle finger under the pede. All in all he sad it is much more likley to be real then fake, but if it is fake it's a damn good one.
My friend takes courses on digital photography at Acedeny of intsutue of sanfrasico and he say its real. I showed him the pic and he said it would be very difficult for anyone to blend the image that perfectly where the pede is gripping his finger. Also that if you compare the reflection on the pedes backend and head section to the shadows on his shirt the the angles match up as if they came from the same light source, the way the light trasfers from the rear of the to the tip of his index, and the shadow between the index and thumb would also be very hard to fake. And he says the final indication it is real is that the grain of the image on the pede and the grain of the rest of the image is very consistant. But there are two spots where it looks blurred: one with a blurry patch between the third and fourth leg, and the blurryness of the middle finger under the pede. All in all he sad it is much more likley to be real then fake, but if it is fake it's a damn good one.