I should have an answer for you between today and....like next year sometime (I think? GOD MY HEAD HURTS).For example, what do you think will happen when a tarantula with a dominant phenotype but that has a genotype that's heterozygous for a recessive gene lands into the hands of a breeder who has no idea what they're doing in terms of genetics?
How many of the people reading this do you think will even understand that sentance?
Here's the part that made me disagree with you:
Creating life to destroy life for selfish purposes is horrible.
And although metallica stated that the odds are 0% of successfully cross-breeding those two species, they have small sacs anyway, so why not just keep them all? If you ever seriously get to that point where you're going to kill perfectly healthy spiders, I'd take them in a heartbeat to prevent it. I'm sure many of us would.
Anyway...unless it's for research purposes (and even that is a little sketchy to me), there's no reason to hybridize. It does ruin the hobby, as you can see by the whole Brachypelma crosses bullcrap.
How? How would you accomplish this? That's our problem. People think they have access to the knowledge and technology to discover new identifying techniques, if you crossbred a species, do you have the ability to measure the angles of the offspring's organs? (Key identification in some species). I'm gonna say, 'no'.I still think it would have been interesting to see if that could have been the key to an unidentified species, but oh well.
Surely some of the offspring won't make it through... I think it's safe to say anyone who has bred T's has experienced some casualties. Why not send such specimens off to those who make species ID's for a living? If anyone has access to the knowledge and technology neccesary to do the job, it would be them.How? How would you accomplish this? That's our problem. People think they have access to the knowledge and technology to discover new identifying techniques, if you crossbred a species, do you have the ability to measure the angles of the offspring's organs? (Key identification in some species). I'm gonna say, 'no'.
-Sean
Because of the taxonomists I know, you'd get a 'WTH??' and they wouldn't want anything to do with it.Why not send such specimens off to those who make species ID's for a living? If anyone has access to the knowledge and technology neccesary to do the job, it would be them.
Because of the taxonomists I know, you'd get a 'WTH??' and they wouldn't want anything to do with it.
We already know hybrids are possible, we don't need confirmation. We're already doing controlled experiments with hybridizing, (i.e. Volker's work with cross-breeding Haplo's). They won't want anything to do with, "Hey I just bred B. angustum with B. auratum, take a look at the offspring, tell me what you think".
-Sean
This must have been before my time.......Can someone briefly inform me on this or post a link? Googling "avicularia messup" didn't really give me much.all we need in this hobby is another avicularia messup...
There was no single event - the whole Avicularia genus is just a mess, things have been hybridized carelessly for a long time, and so now when you buy an Avic half the time you'll never REALLY be sure what the heck you have.This must have been before my time.......Can someone briefly inform me on this or post a link? Googling "avicularia messup" didn't really give me much.
Best guess....Was this because of hybrids that were mislabled and then sold????
I am not dead set against such experiment, but vagans X albo is the very last one I would have tried. These sp are not very different looking and so the offspring of those isn't anything spectacular and could easily be mistaken for either one or the other parent species by untrained fellows.Also, Ryan, you said those are B. vagans X B. albopilosum? How would you classify them then? Brachypelma vagans-albopilosum? What would be the correct way to identify them?