How many would venture to make a project of keeping and raising genus Atrax?

atraxrobustus

Arachnoknight
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
163
How many people would consider keeping the genus Atrax? ( A. Robustus, A. sutherlandi, and A. yorkmninorum ) ? While it would probably be extremely dangerous, I don't see how it would be necessarily out of the question, with the proper precautions.
 

RTTB

Arachnoprince
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
1,771
I'm sure many would be interested if these spiders became available.
 

pannaking22

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
4,226
Good luck getting them out of Australia. If you were to get some though I could see a decent amount of interest, though making people keep them with the proper safety protocols might be difficult. Considering the defensiveness of the spider and the sheer volume of venom it can inject on a bite it might not be the best thing to bring over. Access to antivenin would be necessary too in case something were to go wrong and I imagine that would be even harder to get (unless you're milking your spiders).

Personally I wouldn't mind one in my wet collection or embedded in resin. They're a very good looking genus, as are Hadronyche.
 

schmiggle

Arachnoking
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,220
Your first step would be moving to Australia :p As Pannaking said, they are not usually happy to export native animals. If you brought them here I would definitely go for keeping one, though...highly venomous animals are really cool, especially when they live longer than a few years, and I plan to get a Sicarius when I don't have to worry about small children getting themselves bitten.
 

Chris LXXIX

ArachnoGod
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Messages
5,845
The venom (more higher in the case of 1.0 specimens, notably, in A.robustus) is a problem. Not only because 'you' risk the 'lights off', but because to grab per time, outside of the Sydney area, the antivenom 'shot' required for would be almost impossible.

Consider also that, recently, Australia is a bit 'short' on those antivenom 'personal stock'.

What people fail IMO always to realize is that, (imagine to) keep one here in Italy (or in Poland, Hungary, Romania or whatever), a 'whoops!' happens, and 'you' are freaked. The antivenom wouldn't arrive in time, no way Sir.

In Italy you would be long time dead before bureaucrecy ended, lol. Dunno... probably in the States things works better but not here.

Therefore, this is the real issue: a bite in Sydney area, quickly at the E.R, and chances % of a fatality are pretty low (in fact, since the creation of the antivenom, in early '80, fatality rate went down), a bite here in Europe and bye bye.

Only 'Pro' is that, on your grave, as a memento, you can ask your family to engrave this v

- A pic with the finger straight, with written: 'here lies the mortal rest of a brutal genuine A-:mooning: that never gave a damn about everything, suckers. So was his spider.'
 

atraxrobustus

Arachnoknight
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
163
The venom (more higher in the case of 1.0 specimens, notably, in A.robustus) is a problem. Not only because 'you' risk the 'lights off', but because to grab per time, outside of the Sydney area, the antivenom 'shot' required for would be almost impossible.

Consider also that, recently, Australia is a bit 'short' on those antivenom 'personal stock'.

What people fail IMO always to realize is that, (imagine to) keep one here in Italy (or in Poland, Hungary, Romania or whatever), a 'whoops!' happens, and 'you' are freaked. The antivenom wouldn't arrive in time, no way Sir.

In Italy you would be long time dead before bureaucrecy ended, lol. Dunno... probably in the States things works better but not here.

Therefore, this is the real issue: a bite in Sydney area, quickly at the E.R, and chances % of a fatality are pretty low (in fact, since the creation of the antivenom, in early '80, fatality rate went down), a bite here in Europe and bye bye.

Only 'Pro' is that, on your grave, as a memento, you can ask your family to engrave this v

- A pic with the finger straight, with written: 'here lies the mortal rest of a brutal genuine A-:mooning: that never gave a damn about everything, suckers. So was his spider.'
Which would be one of the reasons to export the genus. The problem is that even in the local sense, pretty much NOBODY has them in captivity, being the reason there's a rather extreme shortage on the anti-venom. The notion is that by allowing people that have the knowledge and that respect the genius, it would seem that, given the fact that you can only get so much venom out of a single specimen without killing or causing harm to the specimen itself, you need multiple specimens of a single species to produce wide scale anti-venom. (such as what was done with Lacterdactus, which made the anti-venom widely available to affected regions.) Therefore, if they become slightly more common, the venom becomes more easily obtainable, and anti-venom production can be increased, making the genus marginally less dangerous.

The thing with Atrax is that because you need the anti-venom upfront for it to really make a difference, it makes better sense to be able to produce anti-venom on at least a medium scale production, and then to deploy it on the front lines of the medical system, Particularly EMS, once you have a confirmed bite. Problem with this is that in order to do this, you need a wide-enough scale of production that doesn't exist. Because of the rather quick-acting nature of the venom, it would just seem best to deploy it as an "emergency drug" in the affected regions. Mind you, If keeping any potentially lethal species, having the antivenom on hand is a matter of course, if one is smart.

Of course, then again, I suppose it is correct to say that there would be no way of IDIOT proofing this sort of thing, and the next thing you know, you have an escaped specimen that has bitten several people, with no anti-venom in sight. To me it would just seem that humans tend to have rather irrational fears of the genius Atrax that seem to be based on things besides the point of the potential effects of being bitten. (I've heard accounts of Atrax specimens being much more aggressive than any spider is in reality. )
 

atraxrobustus

Arachnoknight
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
163
Your first step would be moving to Australia :p As Pannaking said, they are not usually happy to export native animals. If you brought them here I would definitely go for keeping one, though...highly venomous animals are really cool, especially when they live longer than a few years, and I plan to get a Sicarius when I don't have to worry about small children getting themselves bitten.
Indeed S. terrosus is a unique species in terms of appearance. Looking at one, I could see the possibility for mistaking them them for A. Henzi. at first glance.
 

Chris LXXIX

ArachnoGod
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Messages
5,845
Which would be one of the reasons to export the genus. The problem is that even in the local sense, pretty much NOBODY has them in captivity, being the reason there's a rather extreme shortage on the anti-venom. The notion is that by allowing people that have the knowledge and that respect the genius, it would seem that, given the fact that you can only get so much venom out of a single specimen without killing or causing harm to the specimen itself, you need multiple specimens of a single species to produce wide scale anti-venom. (such as what was done with Lacterdactus, which made the anti-venom widely available to affected regions.) Therefore, if they become slightly more common, the venom becomes more easily obtainable, and anti-venom production can be increased, making the genus marginally less dangerous.

The thing with Atrax is that because you need the anti-venom upfront for it to really make a difference, it makes better sense to be able to produce anti-venom on at least a medium scale production, and then to deploy it on the front lines of the medical system, Particularly EMS, once you have a confirmed bite. Problem with this is that in order to do this, you need a wide-enough scale of production that doesn't exist. Because of the rather quick-acting nature of the venom, it would just seem best to deploy it as an "emergency drug" in the affected regions. Mind you, If keeping any potentially lethal species, having the antivenom on hand is a matter of course, if one is smart.

Of course, then again, I suppose it is correct to say that there would be no way of IDIOT proofing this sort of thing, and the next thing you know, you have an escaped specimen that has bitten several people, with no anti-venom in sight. To me it would just seem that humans tend to have rather irrational fears of the genius Atrax that seem to be based on things besides the point of the potential effects of being bitten. (I've heard accounts of Atrax specimens being much more aggressive than any spider is in reality. )
I know what you mean, man, but honestly, the (sad) question is: 'Who really needs antivenom for A.robustus, aside Australia, in the first place?'

We need to consider that said spider lives only in the Sydney area, not even (as you know) in the whole nation. Australian authorities (and I suppose ours as well) are pretty fine to leave things that way, I'm sure.

I think that the last thing they want is to know that there's A.robustus everywhere in Europe and in the U.S. Very few here in Europe really try to study/milk spiders (or other non snakes, venomous inverts) venom.

I can only think about Alpha Biotoxyne, a Belgium based company, doing that. Cash, in general, is almost never used for such things, but for crap. Well at least here, not sure in the U.S

I like your view, but I don't think that's a reason strong enough, they would consider and view only the possible 'Cons' of that, and not statements like yours.
 

RTTB

Arachnoprince
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
1,771
I don't think I would enjoy keeping one because of that "what if.." factor.
 

atraxrobustus

Arachnoknight
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
163
I know what you mean, man, but honestly, the (sad) question is: 'Who really needs antivenom for A.robustus, aside Australia, in the first place?'

We need to consider that said spider lives only in the Sydney area, not even (as you know) in the whole nation. Australian authorities (and I suppose ours as well) are pretty fine to leave things that way, I'm sure.

I think that the last thing they want is to know that there's A.robustus everywhere in Europe and in the U.S. Very few here in Europe really try to study/milk spiders (or other non snakes, venomous inverts) venom.

I can only think about Alpha Biotoxyne, a Belgium based company, doing that. Cash, in general, is almost never used for such things, but for crap. Well at least here, not sure in the U.S

I like your view, but I don't think that's a reason strong enough, they would consider and view only the possible 'Cons' of that, and not statements like yours.
You make some good points. However, bear in mind I'm talking about the entire genius Atrax, not just A. robustus. That said, the notion that A. robustus continues to be confined to the region near Sydney is most probably inaccurate, for the same reasons we sometimes find specimens of P. fera and/or P. nigriventer in the United States by reason of shipping crates, etc. Its only a matter of time before someone encounters the genius Atrax via shipping containers outside the native regions of the Atrax genius, if indeed it hasn't already happened, but yet not been documented. The idea is to be prepared for it before it eventually happens. That said, because A. robustus in particular is known to be easy to provoke into multiple bites, I can definitely see why it might not be the best thing to have around in extremely large quantities, particularly with those whom aren't capable of safely dealing with them. Restriction is one thing, an outright ban is stupid not to mention species discrimination of a sort.
 

RTTB

Arachnoprince
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
1,771
I agree. I would just leave keeping this species to the experts as the risk versus rewards just doesn't sit well with me.
 

atraxrobustus

Arachnoknight
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
163
I agree. I would just leave keeping this species to the experts as the risk versus rewards just doesn't sit well with me.
I definitely agree with that much. Not a genius we want down at the local frat party on a college campus.
 

Chris LXXIX

ArachnoGod
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Messages
5,845
Not a genius we want down at the local frat party on a college campus.
There's no risk for that my man... in general at those kind of parties there's drugs, alcohol, naked Tumblrina and probably, yes, a crypto-pedo janitor lurking as well, but genius? Nada, zip :)
 

atraxrobustus

Arachnoknight
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
163
There's no risk for that my man... in general at those kind of parties there's drugs, alcohol, naked Tumblrina and probably, yes, a crypto-pedo janitor lurking as well, but genius? Nada, zip :)
LOL, thats true. lol :) But could you imagine, a bunch of frat guys and an A. Robustus ? Its rather amusing to think about really, for the simple fact that it proves in concept just how unevolved our species really is compared to our arachnid friends. I am truly convinced that arachnids are smarter than humans, in that we know that their ever present but rarely seen in nature, under normal circumstances, unless they actually want to be seen. Like that Lacterdactus I came across yesterday on the freezer that I gently swept off with a brush. I'm paranoid as to where it is, for reasons solely related to the concept of karma, lol. It almost makes one wonder if certain species actually know their power, lol- or if arachnids are just arbitrarily programmed robots on some level or another.
 

pannaking22

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
4,226
You make some good points. However, bear in mind I'm talking about the entire genius Atrax, not just A. robustus. That said, the notion that A. robustus continues to be confined to the region near Sydney is most probably inaccurate, for the same reasons we sometimes find specimens of P. fera and/or P. nigriventer in the United States by reason of shipping crates, etc. Its only a matter of time before someone encounters the genius Atrax via shipping containers outside the native regions of the Atrax genius, if indeed it hasn't already happened, but yet not been documented. The idea is to be prepared for it before it eventually happens. That said, because A. robustus in particular is known to be easy to provoke into multiple bites, I can definitely see why it might not be the best thing to have around in extremely large quantities, particularly with those whom aren't capable of safely dealing with them. Restriction is one thing, an outright ban is stupid not to mention species discrimination of a sort.
Just throwing this out there, Atrax isn't nearly as mobile as Phoneutria, making the chances of them making their way into a shipping container extremely small. Only mature male Atrax wander, as opposed to Phos of all sizes/ages. I also suspect that they aren't as robust as other spiders, so they would struggle in areas outside what they're adapted to.

Antivenin doesn't keep all that long either, so you'd have to be frequently restocking your supply, which would get prohibitively expensive very very quickly. When being transported, it has to be kept cold, so a casual plane ride from Australia to the US/Europe wouldn't be possible. It'd basically have to be overnighted or two day shipping and that isn't going to be cheap. It's only really feasible in Australia, but they could try shipping specimens to different cities to be milked. I'm sure during the wandering season males are relatively common if people were willing to go out and find them.
 

pannaking22

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
4,226
And I will say, even though I'm pretty much throwing wrenches in the gears here, I probably wouldn't say no to owning one lol.
 

atraxrobustus

Arachnoknight
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
163
Just throwing this out there, Atrax isn't nearly as mobile as Phoneutria, making the chances of them making their way into a shipping container extremely small. Only mature male Atrax wander, as opposed to Phos of all sizes/ages. I also suspect that they aren't as robust as other spiders, so they would struggle in areas outside what they're adapted to.

Antivenin doesn't keep all that long either, so you'd have to be frequently restocking your supply, which would get prohibitively expensive very very quickly. When being transported, it has to be kept cold, so a casual plane ride from Australia to the US/Europe wouldn't be possible. It'd basically have to be overnighted or two day shipping and that isn't going to be cheap. It's only really feasible in Australia, but they could try shipping specimens to different cities to be milked. I'm sure during the wandering season males are relatively common if people were willing to go out and find them.
This is true that antivenin doesn't keep long. But if you have access to venom on site- why would you NOT choose to produce antivenin on site?, apart from the logistics in terms of the facilities required in actually producing it.
 

pannaking22

Arachnoemperor
Old Timer
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
4,226
This is true that antivenin doesn't keep long. But if you have access to venom on site- why would you NOT choose to produce antivenin on site?, apart from the logistics in terms of the facilities required in actually producing it.
Agreed, logistics aside, if you have the people who are willing to be trained to do it they might as well.
 

atraxrobustus

Arachnoknight
Joined
Nov 21, 2017
Messages
163
Agreed, logistics aside, if you have the people who are willing to be trained to do it they might as well.
The thing is that mind you I'm not even going as far as to say a hobbyist should be doing this, given the inherent risk we're dealing with, I'm looking at this on the terms of people that would make a full time job out of dealing with this sort of thing, or at least hobbyists that take any bite seriously enough. (I've actually seen morons that would probably have no problem attempting to handle A. robustus, simply from not registering the epic proportions of the venom i.e. this is NOT on the scale of Lacterdectus or the other medically significant venoms in our part of the world even.) The interesting thing about the last confirmed A. Robustus bite, was that it took 12 vials of antivenin to keep things in check. (most bites require on average 4, where antivenin is administered symptomatically after the first 2 - 4 vials, depending upon severity of envenomation and sex- the male venom is more potent in the Axtrax genius).

In short the point was, that finding 4 vials is hard enough- managing 12 was a heroic feat, even though it was a local bite. The thing is that in my mind there's no excuse to scrimp to find 12 vials when there have only been several dozen at most in terms of verified Atrax bites in history, hence antivenin shouldn't be hard to find.
 
Top