- Joined
- Sep 27, 2002
- Messages
- 1,256
Is that how it's written? Is this an official species yet? At any rate, here's my girl, Buttercup.
Bill
Bill
Attachments
-
33.8 KB Views: 212
I think that is how *longipedum* not aureopilosum and are you sure that you have one? looks more like longipedum to me, nice pic anyway!Originally posted by conipto
Is that how it's written? Is this an official species yet? At any rate, here's my girl, Buttercup.
Bill
Yes to the first question.Originally posted by conipto
Is that how it's written? Is this an official species yet? At any rate, here's my girl, Buttercup.
Bill
Originally posted by Tarantula Lover
I think that is how *longipedum* not aureopilosum and are you sure that you have one? looks more like longipedum to me, nice pic anyway!
James
Originally posted by safetypinup
Actually, longipedum is a little different, based on this picture. This T looks like its legs are a little more "fuzzy", which is not a trait that longipedum has. "Aureopilosum" does seem to have thicker legs, so this might be what you have, Bill. If she is indeed aureopilosum, she will have an orange-ish fringe around her carapace, and, freshly molted, you should be able to see a few orange tinted hairs on her abdomen and legs. I recently read an article that explains in detail the differences between Haplopelma minax and Haplopelma "aureopilosum" (as these two species seem to get mixed up quite frequently).
As for "longipedum", it is rumored that these might be one in the same as Cyriopagopus paganus.
Hope this helps...If you'd like that article, send me a pm tonight and I will send the highlights your way