MiaRich
Arachnopeon
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2017
- Messages
- 1
I just read this article about Grammostola quirogai being found in the wild eating a large snake. http://www.sciencealert.com/a-taran...d-scientists-have-never-seen-anything-like-it This first article I read said this tarantula has no venom. Being skeptical, as I find that unbelievable, I did my research. The original article, published in Herpetology Notes, states only that they found it feeding on the snake and nothing on how venomous it is. http://www.biotaxa.org/hn/article/view/23156/25075
The second article, on LiveScience.com, was more believable and also didn't say anything about it not having venom, only that "there are no studies of G. quirogai venom". http://www.livescience.com/57424-wild-tarantula-eats-snake.html
So again it seems that sensualized news is being pushed over factual news. If anyone asks (and I know I get asked as I'm the resident "spider lady") then please state the facts. Yes, they found a tarantula in the wild eating a snake, no they don't know for sure how it was killed, and there have been no studies to prove how this T's venom works.
What do you all think?
The second article, on LiveScience.com, was more believable and also didn't say anything about it not having venom, only that "there are no studies of G. quirogai venom". http://www.livescience.com/57424-wild-tarantula-eats-snake.html
So again it seems that sensualized news is being pushed over factual news. If anyone asks (and I know I get asked as I'm the resident "spider lady") then please state the facts. Yes, they found a tarantula in the wild eating a snake, no they don't know for sure how it was killed, and there have been no studies to prove how this T's venom works.
What do you all think?