- Joined
- Jan 30, 2012
- Messages
- 3,797
I'm gonna assume most people keep them labeled as they are (Euathlus) because that's what they're known as in the trade. I remember a conversation with Stuart Longhorn I had in 2012 over mail with him and back then he already stated that these should be Homoeomma really. But since there's been no scientific paper done on them, hobby descriptions sticks. Perhaps for the time being until one is release and classified as, for the better to avoid confusion.
Thanks for all the additional information provided herein again, gents!
Thanks for all the additional information provided herein again, gents!