No. Not even if you are bitten by an OW Theraphosidae.
Not that I am aware of. Apitoxin is composed of two major allergens mellitin & phospholipase A2. The former appears unique to bee venom while the latter is also found in snake venom. Neither compounds are found in any spider venom listed in the Spider Toxin Database.
Okay.
I just saw above comments and considered the possibility. I mean, I HAVE pondered, prior to this conversation, how or if my (mild) allergy to bees would translate with T venom. 
Nope. See posted link in my first post in this thread. Some studies have been done while you were offline here
You can lock the enclosures out of reach and subsequently lock the room they are in as well for double protection. You can even add a gate or something for triple protection. Make sure the enclosures themselves are secured and have no weak spots or gaps that compromise the integrity.
I'm well aware of the "studies", but I'm also a medical professional and know that anaphylaxis can kill anybody if not treated properly. To say it isn't possible is ignorant.Nope. See posted link in my first post in this thread. Some studies have been done while you were offline here
This could lead to anaphylaxis, which can be deadly. I realize it's rare, but because it's rare doesn't mean it can't happen.
Agreed, anaphylaxis can kill. It's horrible.
There is no known cross-sensitization between bee venom & spider venom. To make a crude analogy, you can be allergic peanuts & it does not imply an allergy to all nuts.
How does this article prove that tarantula venom causes anaphylaxis??
It proves the medical significance of OW T's and that anaphylaxis can't be ruled out.
They are medically significant, yes. But symptoms described do occur on their own, and don't have to mean the person bitten is in anaphylaxic shock.
Nowhere in my posts was I saying that a "bee venom" allergy is the same a "T venom" allergy. I am however saying that a person who is allergic to tarantula venom (potentially unknown), and I referring to medically significant venom here, to scoff at the idea that someone simply could not go into anaphylaxis is ignorant.
Your previous post states a link between the two, specifically stating that a bite could cause anaphylaxis in the setting of an apitoxin allergy:
I don't believe it matters if the venom is medically significant. Just because a substance causes adverse effects doesn't increase the likelihood that it is an immunogen.
You have been provided with all the necessary resources to come to an educated conclusion on these matters. You have made the choice to cling to a half-understanding of the mechanism of IgE-mediated events & are citing sources that have no bearing on the discussion that you initiated.
Thank for lesson Bill Bye, but where are your sources.
I agree to always err on the side of caution, that is just common sense.
I am not going to argue whether someone could be allergic to either tarantula venom or their urticating hairs. Obviously it is well within the realm of possibilities.
You got all wrong. I'm a medical scientist and I've published papers in (cancer-) immunology and this is definitely not how an allergic reaction works. How medically significant or not significant the venom is or if it even is a venom at all has no bearing at all at its immunogenicity. Instead its the kind of protein that determines if an allegic reaction is possible or likely - you can be allergic to nuts, after all, and they are not generally considered toxic. Tarantula toxins are too small to elicit a full blown immunological reaction, therefore an allergic reaction is exceedingly unlikely, though not completely impossible. However, there is NO report at all so far about allergic reactions to tarantula toxins. ALL the publications you cited were dealing with the effects off the toxins and NOT with an allergic reaction. And we DO know how tarantula toxin works, even if some of the more popular sources you cited do not. The muscle spasms and so on are caused by parts of the tarantula toxins (neurotoxins) that target voltage gated ion channels and NOT by an allergic reaction. Here is just one paper of many: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27045173
The original point I was trying to get to, was because not enough being known with bites, erring on the side of caution that a serious anaphylactic reaction could occur from a bite or urticating hairs is probably best practice.
Also, my apologies, I put "bee allergy" by mistake. The context was meant as tarantula venom allergy. Makes sense why everybody got so bent out of shape.