Considering next acquisitions

Which option do you think is best?

  • A - The more the merrier!

    Votes: 15 88.2%
  • B - Theraphosa all the way!

    Votes: 2 11.8%
  • C - None of them, they are both terrible selections. What are you thinking?

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17

Nocebo75

Arachnopeon
Joined
May 22, 2021
Messages
5
Hi all,

I've been thinking for the last few days on new Ts to add to the collection.

Considering availability and restrictions on each online shop I have come up with two sets of options.

Restrictions on building each set:
  • Vendor A has a minimum order of 150€
  • Vendor B has no minimum, but a shipping cost of 25€, so it also makes sense to get a few in one go
Vendor A:
  • G. pulchra F 2.5cm BL
  • P. irminia L4/L5
  • M. balfouri L5
  • Cyriocosmus elegans L3/L4
  • Linothele megatheloides L5/L6
  • Neoholothele incei L6/L7
Vendor B:
  • Theraphosa apophysis F 7cm DSL
  • Linothele megatheloides L5/L6
  • P. irminia L4/L5
Option A comes to almost exactly 150. Option B to 200 including shipping.

Rationale behind the selections

I'm very interested in both the G. pulchra and the Theraphosa and both should end up in my collection at some point. I don't really mind which one comes first. The Theraphosa has the extra attractive for me of building a nice bioactive enclosure for it, it's something I enjoy doing for my snakes. The extras on both options come to a mix of wanting to raise a few slings (but leaving out of the equation very small ones below L3) plus looking for fast/more defensive examples without going crazy with difficult OWs (the balfouri may be in the fringe there, not sure). I'm interested in heavy webbers hence the Linothele, although I know it's very fast.

Thanks for any feedback/opinions/suggestions!
 

Table

Arachnosquire
Active Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2020
Messages
126
option 1 looks like a great deal. A female pulcra can run you the big bucks, so at that price in snach them up. Considering I payed 80 for my balfori as well, superb deal, and awesome spieces. I don't have a Neoholothele incei but they are great looking and make really nice webbing.
 

Edan bandoot

Arachnolord
Active Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2019
Messages
620
A looks better, theraphosa are overated and you can catch them pretty cheap sometimes
 

LucN

Arachnoknight
Old Timer
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Messages
152
Option A has G. pulchra, that would be my pick personally. N. incei also seems like a really neat NW to have.
 

goonius

Arachnopeon
Joined
Aug 6, 2020
Messages
48
Option A: We bought both a gold and olive N incei a few months ago, and I love them. Their webs are beautiful, they have great feeding response, and pop out of their webs in anticipation even before I drop in prey. Our P irminia has been a great addition too. We got her last summer as a sling -- she has been fast-growing, has gorgeous colors, and has not been nearly as reclusive as we had anticipated. Her web/dirt curtain is extensive, both above and underground and allows her to teleport all over her enclosure to find prey which is entertaining (and a little intimidating at times). You never know where she might pop out and surprise you. That these two are NW without urticating hairs is a nice bonus when cleaning enclosures too.
 

Nocebo75

Arachnopeon
Joined
May 22, 2021
Messages
5
Thank you everyone! Order placed for A, let's see if it's processed and shipped fast :)

The Theraphosa was very tempting, but the wider variety of the first option made me go for it.
 

Liquifin

Arachnoprince
Active Member
Joined
May 30, 2017
Messages
1,651
I'd suggest going for vendor A because the variety and options are more. I'm a very big fan of the Theraphosa genus, but I'd prefer vendor A myself.
 
Top