Certainly, although the amount that do have white setae can surly make visually ID'ing it as A.metallica incorrect and naively presumed.But surely some species don't have the white setae, therefore can rule them out?
So if it is in fact A. metallica, that means I visually ID'ed it incorrectly?Certainly, although the amount that do have white setae can surly make visually ID'ing it as A.metallica incorrect and naively presumed.
The whole genus is mixed up due to people pairing up species believed to be the same. And TBH its all usually through visual misidentification.
Did you say it could be A.metallica or did you say it was in your initial post? :?So if it is in fact A. metallica, that means I visually ID'ed it incorrectly?
The only way it could be incorrect, is if we in fact knew there was no chance of it being an A. metallica. So.... Not incorrect until proven incorrect.