@cold blood I thought that they were the same. I read that the b. smithi was incorrectly identified as a different species than b. hamorii, and they are really one and the same ("b. smithi" as a classification being eliminated). Is this true?
@ScaryGhosts What was thought to be B. smithi, turned out (after a revision of taxonomy) to actually be hamorii....what was believe to be annitha turned out to be the real smithi....or more accurately, a junior synonym of smithi
So changes were made to correct long standing mistakes.
Hello there, why not take a few seconds to register on our forums and become part of the community? Just click here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
