Stands to reason as they are every bit the burrower muticus is. I don't think its as dramatic with the rear legs as muticus though....but @Venom1080 or @KezyGLA might be able to be more clear on this species.
I don't think they are dimorphic like muticus though.
My 2nd T ever was H. gigas. WC female. She had the thick rear legs. They were nearly as thick as an old muticus.
You will find supposed H. gigas females in the hobby with thinner rear legs as there is a lot of hybridisation with other Hysterocrates in the hobby and even a couple in the wild.
Males rear legs seem lengthened but not too thick. I dont think there is much of a difference in that respect. But there is some dimorphism
It sure is one genus that will need a lot of work to sort out.
Hello there, why not take a few seconds to register on our forums and become part of the community? Just click here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.