That makes sense. At that size, if it were female there would be an obvious uterus externus in front of the spermathecae, which is lacking here. I initially assumed this was a smaller specimen.
Hello there, why not take a few seconds to register on our forums and become part of the community? Just click here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.