That's a Tliltocatl species of some sort and definetely not Lasiodora. It lacks the abdominal hairs on the abdomen that goes all the way to pedicel like most Lasiodora species. What you have isn't Lasiodora to me, you have some kind of Tliltocatl species, but they're quite hard to ID since a few species in that genus tend to look alike or similar.
That's a Tliltocatl species of some sort and definetely not Lasiodora. It lacks the abdominal hairs on the abdomen that goes all the way to pedicel like most Lasiodora species. What you have isn't Lasiodora to me, you have some kind of Tliltocatl species, but they're quite hard to ID since a few species in that genus tend to look alike or similar.
i have got 2 adult females and i could probably take a similar looking picture with my phone if i tried (bad lighting + file reduction)
main thing is that the setae are out of focus on the legs and parts of the opisthosoma
There are lots of similar spiders but none are as commonly found in circulation as the Lasiodora parahybana.
do give us the backsory, perhaps there are some clues, and yes the size could also help in making an informed guess
i have got 2 adult females and i could probably take a similar looking picture with my phone if i tried (bad lighting + file reduction)
main thing is that the setae are out of focus on the legs and parts of the opisthosoma
There are lots of similar spiders but none are as commonly found in circulation as the Lasiodora parahybana.
do give us the backsory, perhaps there are some clues, and yes the size could also help in making an informed guess
Hello there, why not take a few seconds to register on our forums and become part of the community? Just click here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
