A. seemanni - Super underdeveloped Female?
Phases

A. seemanni - Super underdeveloped Female?

Or male.. ? This is Jax.. (s)he's last measured at 4.75", haven't measured since this molt.
I'm gonna have to agree with male. At that size, I would suspect it would have much more obvious spermathecae if it was a female. I know males have little nubs like those pictured, I just don't know what they're called

Edit: Oh wow, A LOT was posted in between me writing this. Ignore my redundancy.
 

Media information

Category
Spermathecae sexing (Molts)
Added by
Phases
Date added
View count
1,160
Comment count
13
Rating
0.00 star(s) 0 ratings

Image metadata

Filename
SmartSelectImage_2017-12-28-12-16-04.jpg
File size
448.6 KB
Dimensions
1083px x 944px

Share this media

Top