- Joined
- Aug 17, 2005
- Messages
- 1,407
I've heard among the worst are from a dwarf species that I cannot remember for the life of me. They are not common in the hobby... if at all?
Then Stromatopelma calceatum has some interesting documentation show systemic reactions in people. H. maculata has some interesting documentation as well, where people have received some nasty bites from fairly small slings much smaller than what would normally cause those reactions in other species.
Then the Poecilotheria sp. seem to have quite a bite of variability to the bite reports of those who have been bitten. They range from being just painful, to being significant enough for people to seek emergency treatment due to pain, muscle cramps, profuse sweating, and other symptoms.
Pterinochilus sp., especially P. murinus and P. lugardi have some interesting bite reports attributed to them. I have heard that P. lugardi is worse, but who really knows and how are you going to accurately compare them having so many different variables to each bite incidence from individual to individual?
Haplopelma sp. are reportedly bad as well. I would think from what I have read they are similar in strength to Pterinochilus sp.
Then there is the Australian tarantulas. Those have been shown to have quite nasty bites and are generally less heard about due to not as many people keeping them in captivity compared to other more popular species. I have heard that their bite can cause a dog to die, and is worse compared to many others.
The bottom line is that the LD50 rates DO NOT apply accurately in many areas with tarantulas and that it is widely a gray area that needs to be studied better and more accurately. The majority of information out there revolves around hearsay obtained from word of mouth and bite reports.... which are not exactly credible for accuracy...
Then Stromatopelma calceatum has some interesting documentation show systemic reactions in people. H. maculata has some interesting documentation as well, where people have received some nasty bites from fairly small slings much smaller than what would normally cause those reactions in other species.
Then the Poecilotheria sp. seem to have quite a bite of variability to the bite reports of those who have been bitten. They range from being just painful, to being significant enough for people to seek emergency treatment due to pain, muscle cramps, profuse sweating, and other symptoms.
Pterinochilus sp., especially P. murinus and P. lugardi have some interesting bite reports attributed to them. I have heard that P. lugardi is worse, but who really knows and how are you going to accurately compare them having so many different variables to each bite incidence from individual to individual?
Haplopelma sp. are reportedly bad as well. I would think from what I have read they are similar in strength to Pterinochilus sp.
Then there is the Australian tarantulas. Those have been shown to have quite nasty bites and are generally less heard about due to not as many people keeping them in captivity compared to other more popular species. I have heard that their bite can cause a dog to die, and is worse compared to many others.
The bottom line is that the LD50 rates DO NOT apply accurately in many areas with tarantulas and that it is widely a gray area that needs to be studied better and more accurately. The majority of information out there revolves around hearsay obtained from word of mouth and bite reports.... which are not exactly credible for accuracy...