WC T's - Your thoughts?

Katiekooleyes

Arachnosquire
Joined
Aug 4, 2018
Messages
82
Howdy doody. Was doing a spot of window shopping on a couple of sites for T's, and i came across a WC Aphonopelma chalcodes. Personally, I'm not a fan of WC (I know all T's were WC'ed at some point). but i began to think, what are other peoples views on this?
 

Chris LXXIX

ArachnoGod
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Messages
5,845
I'm not completely against. Depends. After all, basically every Asian (and not) 'pede available in the trade is WC, yet almost no one say nothing about this.

While technically, with WC specimens, a more risk of ending with a specimen with 'parasites' or for that matter a specimen that had a previous chemical/whatever exposure etc may exist, still the issue is more rare than sometimes people make it out to be, in general.

Overall I'm a 'CB' man when it comes for T's, that's the future... but I'm not completely against a WC specimen only for that.

What bother me a bit (and this is why I've said 'depends', prior) is that here we are talking about Europe (since forever, the market of T's) and the spider is a A.chalcodes, definitely not a new or sorta new discovered species, nor an impossible to breed one.

Still I have noticed that, often, in the European trade, when it comes to said genus, the mentality is to prefer to 'lazy rely' on import-WC instead of the CB breeding :writer:
 

l4nsky

Aspiring Mad Genius
Arachnosupporter +
Joined
Jan 3, 2019
Messages
1,076
Howdy doody. Was doing a spot of window shopping on a couple of sites for T's, and i came across a WC Aphonopelma chalcodes. Personally, I'm not a fan of WC (I know all T's were WC'ed at some point). but i began to think, what are other peoples views on this?
Oh this can turn ugly...
Great for advanced breeders to establish captive bred lineages in the hobby to relieve the collecting pressure of those still in the wild.

Horrible otherwise, not really a fan of WC if they are just for the collector who has no intention of expanding the population and just props up the desire to own one and decimate the wild population.

Feel free to crucify me now.

Thanks,
--Matt
 

Ungoliant

Malleus Aranearum
Staff member
Joined
Mar 7, 2012
Messages
4,095
Howdy doody. Was doing a spot of window shopping on a couple of sites for T's, and i came across a WC Aphonopelma chalcodes. Personally, I'm not a fan of WC (I know all T's were WC'ed at some point). but i began to think, what are other peoples views on this?
I prefer to buy captive-bred rather than wild-caught, as over-collection of animals contributes to their decline in the wild. Captive-bred spiders also seem to be less likely to come with parasites. (I don't look at it from a quality of life perspective, because a captive tarantula has a very easy life compared to a wild one.)

That being said, all of our pets are ultimately descended from wild-caught spiders. That's the only way new species enter the hobby, and it's the only way existing captive-bred stocks get an infusion of fresh genetic material.
 

myrmecophile

Arachnolord
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
655
My big concern with CB is the hybrid issue. If I can be sure the critter is pure I am fine with it other wise WC for me.
 

Rob1985

This user has no status.
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
866
I mean, if they're pretty cheap and not from a country where tjhey are considered endangered, it's kinda of whatever for me. I've had several WC over the years, including an A. hentzi female I caught myself many many years ago while out in western Texas.
 

Minty

@londontarantulas
Joined
Feb 2, 2018
Messages
488
I aim to buy CB and seeing a tarantula is WC has stopped me from buying it in the past. However, other than endangered species, I feel that WC species help keep the gene pool diverse, over time, so there is a small place for them in the hobby, assuming it doesn’t decimate the wild population.

I think most keepers with any sort of morals, would aim to buy CB over WC, when possible.
 

RezonantVoid

Hollow Knight
Joined
Jan 7, 2018
Messages
1,354
Often times I find out after I buy a T it's WC by the presence of mites. I'm often disappointed to see them like that. I would 100% choose CB over WC but unfortunately it's hard to tell unless you carefully inspect the T before hand
 

The Grym Reaper

Arachnoreaper
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
4,833
While I wouldn't actively seek them out, I wouldn't turn down a healthy T down just for being WC. I don't really have a problem with it if it's not an endangered species.

You'd be hard pressed to find CB A. chalcodes adults in the UK anyway.
 

Chris LXXIX

ArachnoGod
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Messages
5,845
My big concern with CB is the hybrid issue. If I can be sure the critter is pure I am fine with it other wise WC for me.
I understand but I think that this concern is a bit exaggerated. I mean, yes, happened (and unfortunately will continue, probably) but the vast majority of the breeders aren't all 'Frankenstein/s' :)
 

MissouriArachnophile

Arachnoknight
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
216
Illegal operations regarding tarantulas is probably not as bad as other species, like parrots . Profit is what fuels the unprofessional capture of wild animals. There's proper channels for bringing newer tarantulas into the hobby. Now if someone was collecting specimens from there own region for their collection, I'm alright with that.
Reminds me of people who pay to kill endangered animals, because the people who provide it say it is better for the population. Hot topic issue I probably should of stayed out of.
 

Dennis Nedry

Arachnodemon
Joined
Oct 21, 2017
Messages
672
If they aren’t threatened by the collection it shouldn’t be much of a problem, they were all wild caught at one stage
 

SonsofArachne

Arachnoangel
Joined
Dec 10, 2017
Messages
961
I avoid WC and try to buy only CB, but the T's you buy from dealers may come as WC imports without you (or even the dealer) knowing it. After all you can only take people at their word in many cases. And as far as new species coming into the hobby goes, the only way that can happen is wild collecting, although I would prefer to see the first specimens go to established breeders rather than the general public.
 
Last edited:

Stormsky

Arachnopeon
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
33
I think there’s no problem if it’s done sustainably. It establishes a population in the hobby for new species and refreshes the bloodline of existing species. As long as the wild population can easily recover, there’s lots of benefits to the hobby from a batch of wild caught specimens on occasion.
Of course in a perfect world, the best course of action would be to catch a few, breed them, then release them again with a percentage of the slings and use the remaining captive bred slings to spread through the hobby. But there’s some who would rather “cut out the middle man” and just sell what they can catch.
 

Arachnophoric

Arachnoangel
Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
947
Although I don't have anything against WC Ts in particular, it'd depend on the circumstances for me. It wouldn't sit right with me to purchase a WC T from an individual if they were just going out and collecting wild Ts for the sole purpose of turning around and selling them for profit, especially if it was a species that could be readily bred in the hobby. That's just my personal feelings on it, though, and I can understand the benefits of reintroducing wild blood into our captive specimens to diversify the genetic pool, as well as WC specimens being how we get new species into the hobby.
 

basin79

ArachnoGod
Active Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2013
Messages
5,893
I don't have a problem with an actual wild caught tarantula. And I'm sure if a tarantula could pick it'd choose captivity too.

The obvious problem comes from the ethics. Are they endangered? Do the collecters cause a lot of damage getting them? Does their removal have any lasting effects on the ecosystem? Do most not make the journey so are collected in their 1000's to ensure a few hundred actually make it?
 

SteveIDDQD

Arachnosquire
Joined
Dec 4, 2018
Messages
71
Depends on what it is for me, but I'll always prefer CB where possible, and in some cases rule out WC altogether.

I think with A.chalcodes being popular for beginners, cheap and very slow growing they are exported too much. I feel when animals take 5+ years to mature, it's pretty irresponsible to take them from the wild in such big numbers. But then again I'm sure that particular spider (after it's spent a few weeks or more in a tiny cup while being exported) has a much easier and safer life than it would in the wild. I guess the right answer is quite complicated and down to each buyer to decide.

I'm on the fence with getting a jumping spider right now, I would like one from the spider shop but they are WC. Would buy CB no problem.
 

viper69

ArachnoGod
Old Timer
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
17,937
If we don't have fresh genes from WC's at some point our CB Ts will have 25 legs or none. But obtaining must be done responsibly, and most of the time it is not.

For example, I. mira, was illegally taken from its native country. It's "firmly" established in the hobby.
 

CJJon

Arachnokrólewicz
Joined
Oct 28, 2018
Messages
601
If we don't have fresh genes from WC's at some point our CB Ts will have 25 legs or none. But obtaining must be done responsibly, and most of the time it is not.
Is familial cross-breeding of siblings really a concern? It isn't for fish and reptiles. Guppies can be inbred to 180 generations before problems. I also thought I read someplace that all of the Psalmopoeus pulcher available in the hobby came from one egg sack produced by one WC female.
 
Top