Staehilomyces
Arachnoprince
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2016
- Messages
- 1,514
The black and yellow on Sulawesi and black gigantea have a contrast hard to beatI've yet to see an overseas equivalent of many of our morsitans morphs that aren't in the hobby. Then there's this laeta:
View attachment 274478
I know this is all subjective, but most people crave the Aussie pedes. I personally think all the Gigantea variants are fairly mediocre in colour - size is their main appeal.
Did I say they looked the same? NoSame colour scheme does not equal the same appearance. Sometimes, it's arrangement that does it. Overseas has stuff unlike anything we have, but the likewise statement is also true.
It's just a way to describe physical appearance. Not sure why that's an issue. Also, I've had turd brown subspinipes from rare locatlities and a pede very similar to the Malaysian Jewel in looks as well but it doesn't mean I think they're special.Have we really got so hung up on opinions that we're attributing pede features to mutations and diseases?
When last I checked, you have a tiger form rubripes. I have no idea how you got it, but it seems like it'd be a bit of trouble for an "unremarkable" pede.
Size hardly matters, I adore my laeta because it's so colourful and often above surface unlike all my other pedes which are pet holes for the most part. They are absolutely worth it, small pedes aren't to be overlooked especially the colourful pedes like the arboreal cormocephalusI never really saw much appeal in R. nuda before, as I didn't really care for keeping smaller pedes, but my red morsitans changed that. Now, I'll be trying to get some R. nuda as well.
I never said I had better lol. I simply stated an opinion; which is that Ethmostigmus are pretty ugly.I just don't get why you two have been turning a thread showcasing a couple finds into a "mine are better than yours" argument.
They look like any other big centipede to meI never said I had better lol. I simply stated an opinion; which is that Ethmostigmus are pretty ugly.
I said they were ugly. That's a pretty subjective term so I'm not sure how I was stating it like a fact. People are free to disagree, it doesn't make me sad that they do. Not sure why it's great for people to give compliments but wrong for people to state their dislikes. It's not like I was insulting your person.Must agree with that. It takes more than a slightly enlarged pair of spiracles and a lack of overlap in the cephalic plate (which makes about a millimetre's difference) to turn me off an entire genus.
Besides, you stated your opinions as though they were facts, when I'd venture to say that the majority of the people on these boards disagree with you. The whole "mine are better than yours" affair that you bought up, and your saying that Aussie pedes look like {insert disease here}, are quite childish in my opinion, especially as this thread's initial purpose was simply to showcase a couple finds.
Because a fake compliment is better than an honest dislikeNot sure why it's great for people to give compliments but wrong for people to state their dislikes.
Most compliments you will ever hear are at least a little bit fakeBecause a fake compliment is better than an honest dislike
The thing is, this thread wasn't about what users' favourite genera are, or which countries have the best pedes - it was simply showing a couple finds. There was no need for the blanket statement that Australian pedes are unimpressive, especially when nearly every overseas hobbyist drools over the forms we have here.I said they were ugly. That's a pretty subjective term so I'm not sure how I was stating it like a fact. People are free to disagree, it doesn't make me sad that they do. Not sure why it's great for people to give compliments but wrong for people to state their dislikes. It's not like I was insulting your person.