This makes sense.To be fair, he said "poisonous sting" which is pretty much correct; a sting generally injects a type of poison, which is venom.
He never said that centipedes are poisonous to consume or to touch.
Actually, yes. Fangs are teeth or mouthparts (for spiders, chelicerae) that have been modified to inject venom. Spiders have fangs and not stings. A sting is any other part of the anatomy that also does so, so a centipede bite is technically a sting as the forcipules are not mouthparts but modified legs. Still, the forcipules are close to the mouthparts and are used like fangs, so most people, including me, say bite instead of sting.This makes sense.
But can a centipede's fangs be called a sting? Are tarantula's fangs also a sting?
Think of how a cone snail's venomous barb is considered a sting even though it's on the snail's face rather than the lower body like on a wasp or scorpion. Anything that isn't part of the mouth is a sting technically speakingThis makes sense.
But can a centipede's fangs be called a sting? Are tarantula's fangs also a sting?
That's odd, the enzymes are toxic so you'd think they'd be called venomous, right?One thing that confuses me is the difference between injected digestive enzymes and venom. Assassin bugs (and some other predatory hemiptera) are not considered venomous - but they inject digestive enzymes when they bite. These enzymes - in addition to breaking down tissues for feeding - also kill, paralyze, or otherwise incapacitate their prey and cause intense pain when the bite is used defensively against a larger animal or person. So why are they not considered cytotoxic venoms?