hecklad
Arachnosquire
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2019
- Messages
- 120
I started trying to read about them today but I couldn't find much info on size. Any input is appreciated
According to this paper, at least 4.75"-5".I started trying to read about them today but I couldn't find much info on size. Any input is appreciated
Awesome! Thank youAccording to this paper, at least 4.75"-5".
They are probably confusing S.aztecorum for the S.heros "Ghost Morph". S.aztecorum is a valid species but once was considered a synonym of S.viridis.People say they are close to heros sized. I think 5-6 inches total would be about right.
No, they are talking about aztecorum. As far as I know the ‘ghost’ pede you are talking about is also probably aztecorum. Are you referring to the Northern California pede?They are probably confusing S.aztecorum for the S.heros "Ghost Morph". S.aztecorum is a valid species but once was considered a synonym of S.viridis.
Yes, but what I am saying is S.aztecorum is not a giant centipede, but that I have seen people list a S.heros "Aztecorum" or "Ghost Morph" before. Which means they are probably ignorant to the fact S.aztecorum is a valid species and neither does it qualify as a giant centipede.No, they are talking about aztecorum. As far as I know the ‘ghost’ pede you are talking about is also probably aztecorum. Are you referring to the Northern California pede?
Yes, but what I am saying is S.aztecorum is not a giant centipede.
I’ve never once seen this happen. I’ve heard of people talking about ghost heros and ghost centipedes. Besides them being misidentified as polymorpha, people seem fairly aware that aztecorum is a unique species.but that I have seen people list a S.heros "Aztecorum" or "Ghost Morph" before.
Again, this depends on who you are asking.neither does it qualify as a giant centipede.
I agree with this. I’m not sure what it’s has to do with this though?I don't believe S.viridis even occurs in California - highly doubtful.
When was it considered viridis? There have been a lot of really bad taxnonomy mistakes throughout history. That doesn’t really mean much in the end.Because S.aztecorum was once considered a synonym of S.viridis, however S.viridis does not occur in California
I don't believe S.aztecorum occurs in much farther north than San Diego (or so). So what is this ghost centipede from Northern California?
When was it considered viridis? There have been a lot of really bad taxnonomy mistakes throughout history. That doesn’t really mean much in the end.
They have been found in riverside county. You also have the Northern California variant of them. @BobBarley works with them and claims they are indeed aztecorum. Someone who works with North Americans Pedes drew me a range map which included a rough line from Baja California up pretty far north. I don’t believe that this was correct though. I think the species occurs from Baja to riverside, maybe a Orange County, and I’m not sure where to go after that.
There are four S. viridis ssp. in the state and Baja, Mexico.Because S.aztecorum was once considered a synonym of S.viridis, however S.viridis does not occur in California and I don't believe S.aztecorum occurs in much farther north than San Diego (or so). So what is this ghost centipede from Northern California?
Does anyone here on the board know the natural distribution of S.aztecorum?
"S. heros 'Ghost Morph'" was coined by Michael Emistry several years back. It was ridiculous then, and it's just as ridiculous now.They are probably confusing S.aztecorum for the S.heros "Ghost Morph". S.aztecorum is a valid species but once was considered a synonym of S.viridis.
For the sake of not using someone else's pics, here are some adult specimens accurately represented:
https://gramho.com/explore-hashtag/scolopendraaztecorum