Phases
Arachnoknight
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2017
- Messages
- 205
Thank you. Now I gotta face the camera :\
This site is here to help you. Use the knowledge of all the keepers here to your advantage. If nearly the entire community is against a certain idea, you can be pretty sure it's just a bad idea.View attachment 246664
Welp, that was a short lived experiment :'(
After reading what was on the two sites I linked above, and knowing these came from the same seller (not who I bought from, who THEY got from), and their cost vs that of M. balfouri - seemed like a pretty solid opportunity before me. Sadly, I'm not even sure if the survivor was my original one or not. I would prefer that but who knows.
I discovered it last night after my second check in, and @Venom1080 was so very right. I checked on them, they were both there, then I blinked for a second while grabbing a flashlight. Literally I turned around, grabbed it, and turned back, and then all there was, was a leg. Rest of whatever or whoever was left, was down in the burrow. I had a pretty sleepless night. The picture above was from this morning, a few minutes ago.
So, a couple post experiment considerations and observations:
1. Well, next time I will be sure to use spiderlings who are still together, from the sack, and never separate. Or, buy as a group sold meant to be communal by the seller.
2. I don't know which is the survivor but to be honest I'm just.. so happy.. that there IS a survivor. This could have easy resulted in two dead or dying Ts. I worried about that all night. This one left measures 2" which is what I measured my original at, and the second seemed smaller. But, I'm just not sure.
3. I now need to determine if this enclosure is too big for the one. He seems okay, but, we see how far my judgement got me. He did put part of the dead T in the water, and has expanded the webbing at his entrance. He's working on that a tiny bit now as we speak. He's still eating part. Part is, I assume, still in the burrow. Which is at least 3" down, maybe 4 or more. Originally, he was in something about 4x less dirt volume, with no water.
Thoughts?
4. Well. I guess I can name him. Hannibal? Lecter? Cain? That seems mighty fitting. "Cain, the firstborn, tilled the soil, and his brother Abel was a shepherd. The brothers made sacrifices to God, each of his own produce, but God favored Abel's sacrifice instead of that of Cain. Cain murdered Abel. God punished Cain to a life of wandering, but set a mark on him so that no man would kill him."
I'm not 100% but I THINK it was the one at the bottom that .. tilled the soil... and ate the other. Who as far as I know was a sibling. He's now doomed to a life of solitude and wandering. I'm not going to put a second one in there, so no other will kill him. But he shall be alone, forever, now.
Heh. It *does* fit.
Or maybe some fictional character who absorbs the powers of others he kills. Is there such a thing? So he can be sorta, a super tarantula.
... :'(
5. Well guys. I'm bummed. Humbled. Embarrassed. Depressed. I feel like I let my lil guy down. I don't even know how best to describe it but I was very excited about the possibilities with this. At least one is still alive. I was afraid if it didn't work out the survivor would be injured and I would have had to decide how to handle it, which would have really, REALLY upset me. I worried all night about that, so I was relieved enough this morning when seeing the one alive and well and .. at work.. to feel well enough to make this super, super depressing post that I dreaded all night, and take whatever beating is coming my way.
To use a phrase I hate, it is what it is.
Edit: After reviewing pictures and looking at this guy now, and remembering what I saw last night - I am fairly sure the survivor is the smaller, non-original one. And it was the bigger, original, who was on top of the two, mostly at the mouth of the burrow whilst still alive.
Was nearly the entire community against the idea? I missed that part amongst the likes and conversation.This site is here to help you. Use the knowledge of all the keepers here to your advantage. If nearly the entire community is against a certain idea, you can be pretty sure it's just a bad idea.
You let your animals down, try not to do so again.
Awesome! Thank you! Is this one yours? Looks slightly different than mine, maybe bigger? Or maybe I just need a super close up shot.Hysterocrates is one of my favorite genera, so sad to see this report. Though H. gigas, laticeps, etc from the same sac definitely can tolerate each other in "communal" conditions while small (which leads some people to label them a "communal" species) these sorts of experiments almost always fall apart as the spiders grow larger. If the prospect of potential losses stresses you out I'd recommend sticking with keeping your H. gigas in separate enclosures regardless of their origins. Their aquatic behavior, obsessive digging/tunneling, and quick growth make them excellent and really interesting spiders to keep regardless, in my opinion! Keep your survivor safe.
Well, evidently not.I did do proper research. I guess you want me to do more and more and more until I either come to your conclusion or abandon the idea due to lack of information - got it. This site is more than just you, Venom.
That'd be nice! I'd love to try the eggsac experience! Have you?You did your research and things happen you've learned from this.
Don't beat yourself over it too long....
When this one grows up, find a mate and hopefully get an egg sac and enjoy life!
It could be a bit bigger. Color can also vary quite significantly based on proximity to molt/premolt with these species, so that could also be a factor. I'm sure you'll definitely notice that immediately when yours molts (along with a big size increase)! Mine have unfortunately never had an opportunity to swim, as I pretty much keep my gigas and laticeps in traditional fossorial enclosures.Awesome! Thank you! Is this one yours? Looks slightly different than mine, maybe bigger? Or maybe I just need a super close up shot.
Thank you again, I want this thread back on track. I will not be endangering him again, I think he's awesome. He is already digging his tunnel far enough for me to feel bad downsizing him. Does yours swim?
I only wish now I'd kept the second one, separately, and just had the two to observe. Maybe my shop will get another in..
That'd be nice! I'd love to try the eggsac experience! Have you?
Made me instantly think of Highlander.Or maybe some fictional character who absorbs the powers of others he kills.
Well, think about it. If no one tried new things there would never be advancement. What if no one had ever wanted to try breeding tarantulas, so that they could offer them to the public? If no one asks 'what if...' or acts on their curiosity, how would we ever learn? How would we ever get ahead? Tarantula communals are always a crapshoot-- heck, even introducing a male and female for breeding purposes isn't foolproof. That's just how tarantulas are. If you google 'H. gigas communal' you will see mixed results, people who advise against it, people who had high success rates, and some who had success at first and then failed. It's not as if it is made out to be an impossible task and OP did it regardless.If you find something you'd like to try but don't see anyone with a working one, don't do it.
I know what you mean. I think it's good to try new things. But this is known not to work. If he made a thread, he would have found out.Well, think about it. If no one tried new things there would never be advancement. What if no one had ever wanted to try breeding tarantulas, so that they could offer them to the public? If no one asks 'what if...' or acts on their curiosity, how would we ever learn? How would we ever get ahead? Tarantula communals are always a crapshoot-- heck, even introducing a male and female for breeding purposes isn't foolproof. That's just how tarantulas are. If you google 'H. gigas communal' you will see mixed results, people who advise against it, people who had high success rates, and some who had success at first and then failed. It's not as if it is made out to be an impossible task and OP did it regardless.
That being said, OP, the general consensus for success is using sac-mates that have never been separated for the highest success rate. Introducing two 2" specimens that were living alone for quite a long time (if I'm understanding what you wrote correctly) wasn't the most well-informed choice. I am sorry it didn't work out for you, however.
Right, I completely agree with you that OP's choice of specimens for this experiment was misguided. However, I do have to point out that it isn't known to have a 100% failure rate. If you google 'H. gigas communal', the first thread that comes up is from a 2009 arachnoboards thread which had examples of success in it. { Here } There is also a youtube video of someone keeping 10 similarly sized (as OP, about 2") H. gigas together with success. { Here } Most people say it's not worth the attempt but there is enough evidence of success to justify at least trying it.I know what you mean. I think it's good to try new things. But this is known not to work. If he made a thread, he would have found out.
Not to mention he tried it with 2 half grown unrelated spiders. That goes against pretty much everything I know about communals.
No, I understood that they were likely sac-mates and you had a decent reason for thinking that. It's just that after a few moments of googling, people who had success seemed to agree that they should grow up right next to each other, not be separated and then re-introduced.As stated, I think maybe more than once, these were bought from the same seller, who got them together from their source. As a shop, I assume their source to be a breeder. These were 2 or under inches in size. It wasn't an unreasonable assumption.
Yes. I could have done better. Most people usually could have in most situations.
You did.I feel like I let my lil guy down
Well, that's because I hadn't seen this thread yet. What @Venom1080 is good info. I've seen him around enough to know he does his research among other reasons.I didn't see anyone anywhere tell me it was a bad idea besides your snarky reply