- Joined
- May 11, 2008
- Messages
- 1,332
Hehe, Oops! I too was certain that they didn't but upon seeing those setae, just to be sure that I was correct I googled the matter, and all of the first few results I checked said yes. So I quickly assumed I'd been wrong all these years, though I'd never seen such a thing.beetles molt o.0 since when?
I was actually wondering that myself, I wonder if they still are receptive even beneath the exoskeleton? up till now I've never seen sub exo setaeHehe, Oops! I too was certain that they didn't but upon seeing those setae, just to be sure that I was correct I googled the matter, and all of the first few results I checked said yes. So I quickly assumed I'd been wrong all these years, though I'd never seen such a thing.
I wonder how then to explain the setae?
I may have just a few minutes ago been given the answer on another forum, photomacrography.net -- The member stated that body grease can frequently leach out through the exoskeleton and create a covering over the exo such as we're seeing here. The complete lack of texture, as though the beetle had been lacquered, pretty much clinches it I'd say.I was actually wondering that myself, I wonder if they still are receptive even beneath the exoskeleton? up till now I've never seen sub exo setae
Thank you very much pannaking!Beautiful pictures and I didn't know they had setae like that either. Very interesting to see!