1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Best lens for close up shots

Discussion in 'Through the Lens' started by Oreorulz2000, Feb 4, 2017.

  1. Oreorulz2000

    Oreorulz2000 Arachnopeon

    I have a NIKON D3300 camera and want to get into photography especially with inverts and other smaller species of reptiles and mammals. I need some help finding the perfect lens for it though.
  2. The Snark

    The Snark Extremely jaded cynical yet optomistic Old Timer

    When you find that perfect lens do post it. I did some research after getting our 3400. Step one, have a six figure a month income. Step 2, choose one from Nikon's Nikor line or an after market company. Step 3, compromise as there is no perfect end all be all lens and focal distance appears to be measured in Angstrom units, step 4, go stark raving insane.
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. Nikon 40mm macro. I use it almost exclusively. $200 new, you can likely find a used one cheaper than that on eBay if you shop smart.
    I just uploaded a photo to the forum gallery called "Ephebopus murinus" that was taken with this lens.
    It has built in auto-focus along with manual.
    • Award Award x 1
  4. advan

    advan raptorer Staff Member

    Really any dedicated macro prime lens(1:1) will do. Do not get fooled by zooms that say "macro" in their names. Even your kit lens reversed, with practice and decent lighting can get you results.

    This was shot with D3100 with kit 18mm-55mm reversed and a speedlight:

    1/2" DLS 2i Psalmopoeus reduncus spinnerets.

    Macro is mainly about practice and lighting. Good luck and welcome to macro! -Chad
    • Like Like x 2
    • Award Award x 1
  5. The Snark

    The Snark Extremely jaded cynical yet optomistic Old Timer

    And, it appears to me, of having the patience of the average glacier attached to a section of the brain that is entirely dormant or suffering from total atrophy in my case. To wit, "Honey, there are teeth marks and slobber on the camera. Did you try taking macros again?"
    • Like Like x 1
  6. The Snark

    The Snark Extremely jaded cynical yet optomistic Old Timer

    I really think photography is one of those left hand right hand brain things that requires abstract thinking. I'm supposedly the extreme of left brain - pure logic. As such, some things just don't click. For example, I love snooker. I can watch the pros for hours. But I couldn't pot a straight shot if the pocket was a basketball hoop.
  7. nicodimus22

    nicodimus22 Arachnosquire Active Member

    IMO, macro photography is a constant battle of having deep enough DOF vs detail-destroying diffraction depending where you set the aperture. Too far on either end and you'll get poor results. Focus stacking eliminates the DOF problem, but you need to have the camera on a tripod and your subject has to be perfectly still for it to work. Not really practical out in the field, but maybe in a controlled indoor setting, it could be used to shoot tarantulas.
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  8. The Snark

    The Snark Extremely jaded cynical yet optomistic Old Timer

    Speaking of macros. This camera, Nikon 3400, has a freeze motion setting where it can take 5 frames per second at full 24 meg pixel res. I was thinking that would be the cat's meow if I could couple it to a good macro lens to catch those spider eyes and antics. You know, pigeon hunting with a rapid fire anti aircraft gun kind of stuff. But I can't find any info on doing this, from Nikon or after market. Anyone have any clues or hints?
  9. Not sure about the freeze motion settingraphics, not even sure if my camera has it. There are a couple of other options to freeze motion 1.) Use a shutter speed upwards of 1/1000 of a second if your subject is really zipping around. And 2.) Take a series of photos of the same subject in the same position and use photoshop to layer them on top of one another. If you do it right it can give you far more detailed shots than just a single photo. (I have only seen the latter used in astro-photography but the same principal may still apply). As far as lenses go, you already know I'm an advocate for the Nikon 40mm dx macro. Nothing negative I can say about it.
    • Useful Useful x 1
  10. The Snark

    The Snark Extremely jaded cynical yet optomistic Old Timer

    Aha. Has a shutter speed of up to 1/4000, adjustable @ up to 5 frames/second and wants a whole heck of a lot of light. Depth of field looks like what I figured, a few angstrom units.
    It's manual mode and ignores what kind of lens is being used. Whee. Fill a 32 GB memory card in a few minutes then just sort through the pics hoping to find one that isn't a blurry mess. Now that's my kind of photography.
  11. Iggy

    Iggy Arachnopeon

    Sorry for the late response, just saw your post. For shooting macro I have 2 lenses that both work beautifully. First is the
    AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor
    105mm f/2.8G IF-ED and the second is the
    Sigma 150mm f/2.8 EX DG APO HSM Macro. Hope it helps!
    • Informative Informative x 1