- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 17,939
I do love talking about science. I chose blue tarantulas for 2 reasons, one it is found in the animal we are speaking about (Ts), and fortunately there is a scientific paper which has examined the evolutionary aspect and other aspects of blue iridescence found in these animals.Yes of course. I would like to point out though that blue tarantulas being your example (M balfouri, P metallica, versicolor slings, etc. are all blue but look nothing alike) is quite a bit less specific than blue legs, orange abdomen and shimmery carapace. Thats rather specific. I’m sure they are probably not related in any way, its just interesting to me that they are so similar.
I believe your head may stop spinning if you read the scientific paper I'm referring to above My example of choosing blue is relevant here.
If we are going to discuss "specific", I think you should be specific, as you haven't been so far.
How specific do you want to be? Shimmering carapace-- not specific enough, because few tarantulas have that-- not true, many do Based on this video, this animal doesn't have an abdomen like GBB. GBBs exoskeleton is almost black on the abdomen, and their setae are a bright burnt orange. Their bodies are covered in orange setae, their carapace is a darker rich blue, unlike the specimen in the video.
None of the traits mentioned in the GBB above are found in this species. This species has a steel blue similar to I. mira's toes.
I'm surprised that someone who felt my peer-reviewed scientific example was simplistic, and wrote of being more specific, is actually overly simplistic himself in his observations
Mind you these traits are rather macro, there are a myriad of others involved in T cladistics to consider in order to even suggest 2 specimens are related.
Last edited: