I think the only thing left to benefit this conversation is some input from people that have bred:
RCF x RCF
PCF x PCF
and
NCF x NCF
I guess RCF x NCF would help too seeing as 100% of the offspring should be PCF according to the hypothesis.
So...
IF
RR always produces RCF, Rr always produces PCF, and rr always produces NCF
THEN
RR x RR will always produce RCF
rr x rr will always produce NCF
and
Rr x Rr will theoretically always produce all 3
At least that much should be easy enough to either strengthen or disprove the...
i would def let the person you purchased it from know if it doesn't make it. they might be willing to replace it since they sent it so close to its molt. it's worth the ask...
a scientific study is still worth doing even if there is no correlation though, right? i know it is in communications...
kinda like the edison quote about now knowing 1000 different ways not too make a light bulb...
if you're talking about in the forums, a sticky is a thread that the mods decide is worth keeping around. they are the 6 or so threads on on the top of the "Tarantula Questions & Discussions" page.
just so you know, i picked up my hot glue gun and a bag full of glue sticks for a grand total of... $5! they are really cheap at wal-mart, and you might think about picking it up for future enclosures.
otherwise, i would think super glue should be fine as long as it's no longer sticky or stinky...
i don't think i would change the water daily. constantly taking out the water dish then replacing it could be pretty stressful to the T. they have their trip lines running all over the place, and you mess them up every time you move the dish.
not to mention, changing their water daily would...
i'm actually a speech comm major. i give speeches like this many times a semester in just about all my classes. i also know a thing or two about giving speeches with a definite "elephant" in the classroom. you're supposed to address that "elephant" in our audience analysis.
a good buddy of...
it's scientifically impossible to prove a negative. that's like asking someone to prove that unicorns DON'T exist. you can't empirically do that. it is impossible to prove a negative!
Hello there, why not take a few seconds to register on our forums and become part of the community? Just click here.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.